The course that ought to be played less--St. Andrew's. Oh, I know its place every 5 years is secure, but to me, it's one of the least interesting venues as far as the play of the professionals is concerned. Too many driveable par 4s, not enough holes where the screws are really tightened (like Carnoustie #18, the Postage Stamp or #11 at Troon). I appreciate the many options given at St. Andrew's, but it really needs severe weather to be much of a test for the pros.
But just because there are severe holes doesn't mean that you identify the best golfer. I have no problem with Padrag winning but we came very close to having a complete unknown, Andres Romero, winning. And the last time at Carnoustie we had Paul Lawrie win and he has done nothing since. VdV should have won in 99 and that would also have been a fluke.
The Old Course seems to allow the best to rise to the top with winners in the last 40 years being Tiger x2, Faldo, Seve, Jack x2, and Daly - arguably a fluke but he had already won a major.
Wayne,
I'm not arguing for a 1999 Carnoustie set-up. What I don't like about the Old Course as an Open venue is that there are few potential disaster holes. The hay at Muirfield and the gorse, bunkers and OB on some other venues make for an exciting tournament. With the exception of Daly/Rocca, I can't think of many exciting finishes at the Old Course. Faldo won easily as did Woods.
Also, I rather liked seeing the players at Carnoustie hitting long iron approaches. To me, it's more exciting to see Sergio have to hit a long iron with water short and OB left than to see Tiger get up and down from the Valley of Sin. I don't want every hole to be as challenging as Carnoustie #18, but a few of those holes sprinkled in are good fun.
St. Andrews seems especially weather-dependent. With benign weather, it's almost a pitch and putt for the pros. When they play the Dunhill Links there in the fall, it's a very different animal and far more interesting.
Keep in mind I'm making a distinction between courses I like to play (more strategic and less penal) and courses I think make for interesting tests for the pros. In my view, St. Andrew's isn't penal enough.