Do maintanence cost guidlelines exist for Tees, Greens, Fariways and Rough in terms of square footage?
For example, can you say when you are designing a course that a green costs $1000 a year per sqft to maintain, or per month, or day, etc. Can you than compare that to fairways, Tees, etc.
The reason I ask is that as a former greenskeeper in my younger days I have an appreciation for how much labor, equipment maintanence, etc. goes into the upkeep of each particular part of a golf course. As I played Royal New Kent and Stonehouse I was amazed at the size of the tee boxes and greens and fairways and thought that they must be very expensive to maintain. At the prices we paid (a very reasonable $49 for RNK, and $30 for the replay at Stonehouse) I wondered whether they could afford the upkeep, let alone make money. Although I did not care for Stonehouse there is nothing more painful than to see a course die a slow death with deteriorating conditions.
I am sure a neighborhood will spring up around Stonehouse to save it and in reading the Strantz interview on this site he maintains that his courses are no more expensive to maintain and any others, but from my observaiton it just doesn't seem to hold water.
PS. on another note, I think his coures that are destinations, like Tobacco Road will thrive due to the novelty, but I wonder about RNK and Stonehouse which are not located at typical golfing destinations.