How much is too much?
Last week, Ian Andrew started a rather interesting thread regarding the relocation of a tee box on a old Thompson golf course. One of the setbacks was the inability to grow healthy turf in the location and the overall difficulty of growing turf on the site in the first place.
Why aren't the natural limitations of a site more noted in terms as to whether or not a golf course is suited for the site?
I think there is a point where the effort to build a golf course exceeds benefit of having a golf course on the site, no matter how much the non-turf issues are conducive to good, sound golf.
How much is too much?