I've played golf with Brad twice - and the last time he was much better than previously. Yoga and golf lessons were a great combo for him! I doubt his game affects his reviews much either way. He is first and foremost a professional writer and tries to write to a high standard.
I really don't envy those who critique for a living. I am not sure there really are any standards guiding such reviews - and its a small business. That said, I kinda wonder why we are critiquing the critiquer here, although I am contributing!
We should focus on the review content -
Is the course full of awkward holes?
Are the bunkers too deep? Too hard to maintain? If not maintained, how does that affect golf?
Is there a place for a "Dell Hole" on a modern course and should it be shaped like a laptop computer?
Is the bye hole a gimmick? A worthwhile one?
Is it "Open Worthy"?
Did it open to soon (i.e., was it "open worthy"?)
And, of course, how were the cart girls?