Tom:
I do understand (and actually appreciate) your aversion to rating modern courses. Of course, as a golf book consumer, I relish the thought of another edition of the CG
.
I specifically granted Bayonne a 8.5-9 to for two reasons: 1) To illustrate that if a modern artificial creation, a la Shadow Creek, could garner such a lofty ranking, then its more contemporary and equally creative offspring might well deserve the same (btw, I agree with Tommy W. that Whistling is probably a slight bit more complete, and thus a better course by a nod), and; 2) To give W. Vostiniak a tweak that his regard for BGC is too low. Its likely a very decent 7.5 as most who've I've heard from having played it, do find it worth a trip to see. It is also quite unique.
I agree 100% with you that BGC doesn't belong to that elite group of other "9's" you cite. Of course, I don't believe Shadow Creek does either, I've played eight rounds at the Wynn-Fazio spectacle, had a great time each visit, marveled at the creativity, but never felt the excitement (other than the aesthetic awe over the flora & fauna) I feel each time I tee it up in Bayonne!
The relativity to Shadow Creek stands paramount as both represent the quality of the absolute "hand of man" and from-scratch creativity that might otherwise be so difficult to achieve success with. Remember that so many of the great painters of the last 1.5 centuries took great liberty to deviate from tradtional interpretations and instead struck out to form positively exotic and extreme canvas that few appreciated initially and only later came around to heap praise upon.
Lets not forget the special kudos that Eric Bergstol earns here. Unlike Fazio, he's only had a hand in designing (or construction efforts) less than 2-3 other courses...something the Faz can't quite so innocently declare pre-Shadow Creek. I think even you Tom, might agree that much of your present work is no less than partially interpretative from your past work. Can you say Ballyneal was a blank canvas that didn't take into account your efforts at Barnbougle or Pacific Dunes? Would it have met the same lovefest of praise if you hadn't done those others? Didn't you say that Sand Hills lent some considerable influence to your work there?
Eric didn't have that luxury of expereince, unless you count building affordable housing in the Bronx
. I could go on, but I think my point has been made and I don't want to practice that verbal diarrhea that plagues GCA these days. Heaven knows I don't claim to be some regional expert or opinion-maker and I'm not writing any golf books nor creating a blog/website devoted to my estimations.
What Bayonne accomplishes is actually quite simple, IMHO. It is an excellent golf course that excels at mimicing traditonal Irish & Scottish playability and strategies. It shines, even among its glorified regional brethen, at providing a superior match play venue, balancing power, finesse, and creativity in a fashion that many wonderful nearby classics do well at, but don't always permit. All of the above makes it fun and sporty (ala Pat Mucci-style), leaving most ready to have another go just after stepping off the 18th green!
PS...I think the differential from 9-to-7-7.5 applies equally to us both. I'm happy to believe we can meet midway!