Yesterday I got into a semi argument with my boss (more like a hard fisted debate) about #8 and #9 at CPC.
About twelve years ago, he played CPC and said some holes, especially #8 and #9, were nothing great and quite simply they were forgetable holes. I asked him why and he said #8 was just a 5-iron wedge, and #9 was just weird because he had no clue what to do (which I pointed out should make the hole interesting!).
According to him, the only tee shot option on #8 was to take an iron and play safe. I pointed out that a decent golfer would have a chance at hitting a fade around the corner to gain an advantage for the next shot. However, he disagreed, strongly, stating that the hole was too much of a dogleg with too many trees on the inside of the dogleg. I pointed out to him that #9 presnted many options off the tee that really makes the tee shot intruiging, but all he could muster that two holes in a row where a good player can hit 5-iron, wedge, from the back tees should not be on a course considered one of the best in the world.
Obviously, I have never played CPC, and thus its hard for me to defend the holes, but what do fellow gca'ers think of these two holes?
I think my boss is simply to old to remember those holes adequately or just played them poorly..
(*NOTE*)-- The above is a joke we give him all the time, with no disrespect intended at all!