"My comment to TEPaul about rangefinders, GPS systems, multiple balls and cheater lines was related to "the spirit of the game".
I think all of the above violate the "spirit of the game" irrespective of their status under the rules of golf."
Patrick:
Yes, I've certainly gotten the impression that you do think that.
So, here's a question for you.
Who do you think has the right or should have the responisibility in the context of the Rules of Golf to write and adopt local Rules or Conditions of Competition?
Do you think that responsibility should rest solely with the R&A/USGA Rulesmakers or do you think it should rest with local committees?
At the present time it appears that a committee may adopt any "Local" Rule or "Condition" of Competition as long as it doesn't waive a R&A/USGA Rule of Golf.
And if that is the case one wonders why there're various "Local" and "Special" Rules and "Conditions" of competition listed in the appendix of the R&A/USGA Rule book and the Decisions book.
What do you suppose the R&A/USGA put those various local and special Rules and conditions of competition in the appendix for if they seemingly allow any committee to adopt any local or special rule of condition of competition on their own as long as it doesn't violate a Rule of golf?
Do you think they did it for the convenience of local committees to adopt standard wording in those cases or do you think the R&A/USGA was trying to make some point in various situations, such as perhaps about something to do with the "spirit" of the game?
I can tell you what is by far and away the most interesting "condition" of competition adopted recently. It was by the Ohio State Golf Association (OGA) when they adopted basically their own "competition" ball "condition" of competition.
Much of the point of the report from the OGA about that tournament was based on the fact that they had the right under the R&A/USGA Rules to adopt that "condition" independent of the USGA if in fact that "condition" did not otherwise waive a Rule of golf.
It seems at first the USGA's Rules Committee and other Rules officials assumed that for a local committee to adopt such a "condition" that the R&A/USGA should adopt one first and put it in the appendix to the Rules to be adopted by local committees or not.
It may still be an open question with the Rulesmakers but for now it seems they may be content to just let this kind of thing be an autonomous act on the part of a local committee provided that "condition" in no way waives a Rule of golf.
I'm quite certain you feel the adopting of this "condition" of competition by the OGA independent of the USGA is something done to protect and preserve the "spirit" of the game.
However, this is not the first time the OGA has tried to adopt a "condition" of competition or a "local" Rule independent of the USGA. Some years ago they tried to adopt a "condition" of competition or a "Local" or "Special" Rule permitting golfers or competitors to fix spike marks.
In that case the USGA responded that that did violate a Rule of Golf and if the OGA played under that "local" or "special" Rule or "condition" of competition they would not be playing by the R&A/USGA Rules of Golf, and if the OGA asked them any rules question in such a competition they would have nothing to say about it.