On another thread Tiger said #17 at Sawgrass didn't belong as the 71st and/or 17th hole of a Championship and/or round.
So did (the old) #1 at Bandon Dunes "belong" as the opener?
Talk about a really, really hard hole, at least it was for us in the face of the summer wind, to a semi- blind green. I dis-liked this hole immediately but forgave it by #6.
I would rather they had not dumbed down the hole with the new green but transported the entire hole to somewhere else in the middle of the round -- say 8th, like Tiger and #17.
Yes, the old #1 at Bandon Dunes did belong as the opener. I always thought #1 was somewhat reminiscent of the 1st at Gleneagles Kings, where David Kidd's father worked. Even if that weren't the case, I liked the fact that the course started with a hole that had an elevated green (rare these days) and could be quite difficult (also rare).
Actually, downwind, from the green tees, the shot to avoid was hitting it too far, to the base of the hill, making the shot into the green blind. Into the wind, it could be a bear. If it wasn't a great 1st hole, I enjoyed it as a 19th (or a 37th) hole for settling bets. Into the wind, it could play driver, long iron and was definitely a tester.
I know some people complained that it was too hard for high handicappers for a 1st hole (see the thread asking why should 1st holes be easy), and it caused delays between 1 and 2. I don't agree with any of that (although I'd like to check out how #1 flows to #2 when playing the tees to #2 behind the #1 green).
I will take the resort at its word, though, that the new green was built in order to prevent players from slicing balls into the resort buildings. I don't think it's an example of dumbing down, nor do I think that's the case with some of the gorse removal.