I do not disagree with anyone that the current bunkers do not resemble old photographs etc, but there is certainly much more to see, study, enjoy, than just the bunkers, and on my list of reasons why I'd wanted to play it for so long, I would say the bunkers were somewhere near the bottom half of the top 10.
Maybe that's just because I've always viewed GCA from a perspective of functionality moreso than aesthetics. Sure, I am a slave to the ocean and I admit it, but beyond that, I would take 10 at Riviera every day of the week, whether the bunkers were shaggy or whether they were cut with a Paul Bunyan sized cookie-cutter, so long as it plays well.
In a perfect world, yes things would look perfect and play even better...but nobody has shown me any reason to believe that if the bunker on 4 at Riviera was shaggy versus what we see now, that it would be any less of a great hole to play golf on. It just might not make as nice of a "Miss June" on a calendar.
Comments like the shrinking of the 1st fairway and the lack of proper strategy for the 8th hole are of far greater concern to me than what the edges of the bunkers look like.