News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Kevin_Reilly

  • Karma: +0/-0
"Lay-of-the-land" Design...article from WSJ
« on: October 01, 2002, 03:21:09 PM »
Today's WSJ featured a small article in the "Small Business" section covering the decision by an architect to go "small" instead of targeting the more glamorous kinds of assignments.  Here it is.  I took it from WSJ.com (instead of a link to the site) because they have a pain-in-the-butt registration.


Designing Small Golf Courses
To Swing With Tough Times

By PAULETTE THOMAS

THE PROBLEM: A played-out market. Raymond Hearn, 41, is a golf-course architect. In 1995, he launched his own firm in Plymouth, Mich., designing courses the typical way -- the showier, the better. "Any course going up had to top the last," he says. "Let's have seven waterfalls instead of two."

He attended the annual PGA show in Orlando, Fla., to rub shoulders with the big dogs of golf. He designed courses such as the aptly named Grande Golf Club in Jackson, Mich. "Everything was scaled up," he says. "They wanted people to say, 'Wow!' " The sand in the bunkers that lined the immense fairways was $42 a cubic yard (the $5 sand wouldn't do.) Everything had a "championship" label. It was, pardon the pun, par for the course, as elaborate private clubs erupted across Florida, northern Michigan and the Carolinas. Mr. Hearn began targeting the Top 100 golf courses to offer his remodeling services.

But as the '90s economy withered, so did golf-course construction. Bankers began to demand actual business plans and land appraisals, which sank many iffy clubs in the planning stage. His small firm -- he and a partner had five employees -- had to lay off one employee and rethink the future.

Everything about golf had exploded out of scale, he decided. The sprawling 7,000-yard courses were part of it. And the shrunken stock market reduced the pool of potential club members willing to pay $200,000 initiation fees.

THE SOLUTION: He conceded what was left of the glamorous, super-size course designs. Instead, Mr. Hearn thought small.

He visited public courses in the British Isles, and little known Scottish courses such as Elie and Cruden Bay. While there, he didn't see executives making deals, but groups of girlfriends or spouses playing together. He met with the Wee Course Society in Scotland. And he loved how the courses, established a century ago, before big earthmoving equipment, fit the rugged landscape. "They were so proud of their local courses," he said.

He nixed his plan to pitch his services to the Top 100 courses, and skipped the annual PGA show in Orlando. Instead, he is pursuing members of the Public Golf Course Owners Association, a smaller trade group. "We're going down to the grass-roots level and saying, 'How can we help you?' " he says.

He's become an advocate for "lay-of-the-land" design, which reduces course development and maintenance costs by tucking the fairways and greens into existing terrain. He won kudos from golf writers for his Hemlock Golf Club in Ludington, Mich., where his "low-profile" design challenges golfers with narrow alleys, exposed sand dunes, and deceptively pitched greens.

For the moment, he has two courses under construction, and five on the drawing board. "That's about the most we can hope for in this economy," he says.

THE LESSON: Inflated times create outsize opportunities. To survive in modest times, scale back with the zeitgeist.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »
"GOLF COURSES SHOULD BE ENJOYED RATHER THAN RATED" - Tom Watson

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: "Lay-of-the-land" Design...article from WSJ
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2002, 04:08:51 PM »

Quote
He won kudos from golf writers for his Hemlock Golf Club in Ludington, Mich., where his "low-profile" design challenges golfers with narrow alleys, exposed sand dunes, and deceptively pitched greens.

Bottom line - has anyone played this course?

Thanks for posting the article, Kevin.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Jeff Mingay

Re: "Lay-of-the-land" Design...article from WSJ
« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2002, 04:18:50 PM »
I've never met Ray Hearn, nor seen any of his work. But the article above seems to infer that it took a "downturn" in the economy for Hearn to realize that "lay of the land" architecture and economy in course construction had some merit? (Perhaps this is incorrect.)

On aside, I've have the good fortune to work with Rod Whitman, and also, recently, through Rod, Dave Axland and Dan Proctor (Bunker Hill). These three guys have been "targeting the grass roots" level (see Whitman's Wolf Creek and Blackhawk, and Bunker Hill's Wild Horse, Delaware Springs and Bayside) for nearly two decades now -- not as a "marketing scheme", but because economizing golf course design and construction is what's best for the game of golf.

The problem is, integrity tends not to pay off. Marketing schemes do.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: "Lay-of-the-land" Design...article from WSJ
« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2002, 04:23:09 PM »

Quote
The problem is, integrity tends not to pay off. Marketing schemes do.

Have a little faith, Jeff. Integrity usually wins out in the end, while marketing schemes always fall to the next one.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Tom Doak

Re: "Lay-of-the-land" Design...article from WSJ
« Reply #4 on: October 01, 2002, 08:35:23 PM »
Jeff -

Aren't you a marketing guy now?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

David_Tepper

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:
« Reply #5 on: October 01, 2002, 09:08:00 PM »
Kevin-
Thank you for posting this article. I missed it in my reading of the WSJ today. Personally, I think this is one of the most positive articles about the potential direction of golf in the U.S. that I have come across in some time. The last thing the game needs here are more over-blown, over-priced golf facilities. We need simpler courses that are less expensive to build and maintain and that are easier (and less time consuming) for beginning and less accomplished golfers to play on a regular basis.  That is the only way the game will really grow in the U.S.  While in Dornoch 3 weeks ago, I played the course at Golspie one afternoon. I was playing by myself and caught up with the twosome of women playing in front of me, who waived me thru. The two women were out for their weekly game. One was pushing her clubs on a trolley. The other was carrying her clubs, but pushing her young baby around the course in a baby carriage! I cannot think of anything that epitomizes the role on golf in Scotland more than that. We need more facilities where something like that is liable to happen here in the U.S.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Jeff Mingay

Re: "Lay-of-the-land" Design...article from WSJ
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2002, 05:43:47 AM »
Tom,

My dad once told me, "Everyone's a salesman," no matter what business you're in. I think that's true.  

So, it boils down to your delivery, how you come across to prospective clients. I guess you either come across like a BS, "marketing guy" or a "regular guy" explaining your product with integrity and sincerity.

I try to operate on the model of the "regular guy," and leave it up to the prosective client to "bite." So far, no luck!  

 :)  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Peter Pratt (Guest)

Re: "Lay-of-the-land" Design...article from WSJ
« Reply #7 on: October 02, 2002, 06:03:06 AM »
I've played three Ray Hearn courses, including the 2 mentioned in the WSJ article. I favor the Grande, near Jackson, MI, which has several very good holes despite a very annoying design tic--bunkers in the middle of the fairway on at least four holes on the front nine. The Grande's back nine is much better.

Hemlock is minimalist to a fault--it has too little definition on many holes, and then you have the utterly crazy 12th, a par five with a semi-blind tee shot to a double fairway bisected by a huge dune. The two fairways are so narrow that neither is preferable. The third shot--if you're lucky enough to get within 150 yards--is blind over the same heaving dune. Great dunes, lousy hole. The 11th is another par-5 that makes much better use of the dunes. Ron Whitten said he liked this course, but I don't quite understand.

Hearn's Twin Lakes, in SE Mich, was chosen one of the 10 best new courses by Golf Magazine a few years ago, but I haven't played it.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »