Some here have referred to the "intimate nature" of Oakmont's routing (as well as many other courses discussed here in this forum), with respect to the golf course in general, and specific loops of holes. But such intimacy is often frowned upon these days, because it is synonomous with saftey hazards/liabilities. For example, a slice off the 4th tee might endanger players on the 5th fairway or green. Similar issues may arise later at Oakmont due to the juxtaposition of the 14th green, 15th tee and 18th fairway.
Oakmont is, in reality, no more dangerous to play than any other golf course in the world, but I find it interesting that holes such as these might never see the light of day if such a routing were proposed today.
Any thoughts?