Jon,
I am awed by you guys who hit 4 iron, wedge to CPC #18. I am not particularly short (#9 is drivable for me, #10 is a driver, long iron) but I have no problem hitting a driver on 18, followed probably by a 7 to 9 iron to the wonderful uphill green site.
The biggest objection to the hole, I think, is the location of the trees in the fairway. I think I can still easily cut a drive over them so they don't bother me much, but I can see why the membership has problems with them. The back tee would give justification for their removal, and perhaps bring the right side of the fairway more into play. I don't remember how far back the rock is, maybe 50 yards? But even if it is feasible from a regulatory standpoint, is it really worth the effort? For the sake of the members, cut the offending trees down and maybe plant replacements on the peripheries.
Thomas,
Intentions are all important to these otherwise well-reasoned folks. Study results in most social sciences can typically be interpreted or nuanced to support whatever point of view the principals hold. My own participation in numerous social psychology experiments in undergraduate school left me highly suspicious of much what is published and peer reviewed in this area of academia.
Meaurable physical data is harder to discount, but one can always make the argument that the potential consequences, known or theorized, are so great that no risk exposure is acceptable. As a real estate practitioner I hate to think how much of my clients' money I've had to spend in environmental studies because of absolutely remote chances of contamination suggested by past uses of a site.
It will likely never happen in CA, but a way to get around the problems with such groups as TCCC is to have property owners seek and obtain relief on the theory of eminent domain (adverse taking of property rights). If the government- meaning the taxpayers- have to compensate the Pebble Beach Company for effectively turning valuable private property to public use at the market price of the highest and best use, it/we may think a little bit harder about these groups' raison d'etre, their methods, and most importantly, the results they achieve on our behalf.