News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« on: November 21, 2006, 09:17:12 PM »
This is done in part to take up the challenge of Matt Ward, an example of which is quoted below.

...
Jay -- I enjoy your comments generally -- but you have come down with a bad case of Sand Hills-itis (the disease that afflicts golfers who give more points to isolated courses than they actually deserve.
...
P.S. Plus -- If you are looking for out-of-the-way golf adventures then try western Colorado or Utah -- with such layouts as Lakota Canyon, Devil's Thumb and The Hideout respectively, to name just three.

Matt has expressed several times that his opinion of The Links of ND is quite low and that he thinks it to be over rated. We will see how a direct comparison comes out below.

To do the comparison, I created four categories, par 3, straight par 4, bending par 4, and par 5. Then I sorted the holes from shortest to longest. The comparison is two long for one post so will follow in the next few posts.
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2006, 09:20:08 PM »
In each case the first hole shown is from The Links of ND website, and the second is my pictures from Hideout.


PAR 3s

Comparison 1

11 139/121/115                                    



3 168/138/123



The hole at the Links of ND is in a valley protected from the wind. If
it were more in the open, it would provide more competition for the
hole at Hideout.

Hideout 1 up

Comparison 2

3 145/132/120                                      



7 172/162/138



Once again a short hole in a protected area cedes the advantage to the
Hideout.

Hideout 2 up

Comparison 3

8 185/174/124                                      



11 180/167/135



Two holes with forced carris of about the same length. The Links wins
based on the more interesting plays forced by the green contours.

Hideout 1 up

Comparison 4

17 232/208/184                                    



17 181/167/150



The somewhat downhill redan style par 3 at the Links easily wins over the
somewhat simple drop shot to a large green at the Hideout.

All square

"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2006, 09:21:13 PM »
STRAIGHT PAR 4s

Comparison 5

13 369/334/290



15 290/280/239





This is an interesting comparison. Both green complexes make for a
difficult up and down. The difference is that at the Hideout, it will
typically be up and down for a 3 whereas at the Links it will be up and
down for a 4. The lay up at the Hideout is less interesting than the
lay up at the Links. Therefore, we are really comparing a go for it
vs. a lay up as the uphill at the Links puts going for it out of reach
for almost all golfers. After only one round at the Hideout, I questioned
the strength of #15, but I will give it the benefit of the doubt and
call this a halve.

All square

Comparison 6

1 407/386/367                                    



12 360/326/298





In my opinion, #12 at the Hideout is an interesting hole
visually. However, it seems to throttle you back too much, whereas,
the first at the Links has simple but strategic bunkering, especially
for front right pins.

The Links 1 up

Comparison 7

14 465/422/406                                  



1 371/352/312





Not a particularly interesting short hole at the Hideout, vs a long
par 4 at The Links with strategic bunkering.

The Links 2 up

Comparison 8

6 465/436/414                                    



16 405/374/341





A truly shining hole at the Hideout that I created a thread about.

The Links 1 up

« Last Edit: November 22, 2006, 10:42:02 AM by Garland Bayley »
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #3 on: November 21, 2006, 09:23:28 PM »
BENDING PAR 4s

Comparison 9

9 346/331/313                                    



5 375/308/275





Dogleg left guarded by a bunker at The Links and by trees at
Hideout. I know many GCAers would choose the bunkered hole, but I am
not as adverse to trees as some so I will call that aspect equal. The
hole at the Links has very significant contour in the green making it
almost imperative that you get your approach in the proper
section. However, Hideout has bunkering at the green that is more
punishing for missed shots. I will call this a halve.

The Links 1 up

Comparison 10

2 350/328/308                                    



4 390/357/326







Another interesting head to head of two of my favorite holes. I am
giving this one to The Links based on the stategies I see opening up
based on pin position.

The Links 2 up

Comparison 11

16 407/392/375                                    



10 400/358/318





Another dogleg around a tree at Hideout, vs. a virtual dogleg created
by the bunkering guarding a right side approach and created by the
angle of the green. The green at The Links has very interesting and
severe contours. I give this one to The Links.

The Links 3 up.

Comparison 12

5 445/415/400                                    



8 402/371/341







The fifth at the Links primarily has the view of the lake going for
it. The eight at Hideout may be controversial, but it wins hands down.

The Links 2 up.

Comparison 13

15 457/426/407                                    



6 415/356/331





A fun dogleg left then down the hill 15th at The Links vs. a fairly
plain hole other than the short forced carry at Hideout.

The Links 3 up.

Comparison 14

12 473/438/410                                    



18 475/438/391





12 is one of the best holes at The Links, so although the 18th is a
good finisher at Hideout, once again The Links carries the day.

The Links 4 up.

"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #4 on: November 21, 2006, 09:24:36 PM »
PAR 5s

Comparison 15

4 505/485/460



14 515/490/448





The Links hole plays uphill starting in a ravine of sorts to a fairway
canting left. Offers birdie chance if not waylayed by hazzards. The
hole at Hideout is a fairly standard dogleg left par 5.

The Links 5 up.

Comparison 16

7 560/518/487



13 540/523/462





One of the better par 5s at each course. Both offer different and
interesting options a shots throughout the hole. Halve.

The Links 5 up.

Comparison 17

10 570/551/527



2 558/501/475







Hideout's weakest par 5 loses this one.

The Links 6 up.

Comparison 18

18 572/542/512



9 581/555/504







I like The Links #18 much better than Matt Ward did. However, I like
the 9th at Hideout better and think it is the best par 5 there.

The Links wins 5 up.
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Forrest Richardson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2006, 10:29:13 AM »
Garland — That was an exciting "round", although I soon became discouraged that "I" was losing to a yardage book.  ;D

Not having visited Stephen's course, I will accept your outcome. For now!

It may be interesting to realize that The Hideout has 15 total bunkers. I counted that many on just a few holes of The Links of ND.
— Forrest Richardson, Golf Course Architect/ASGCA
    www.golfgroupltd.com
    www.golframes.com

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #6 on: November 22, 2006, 10:46:35 AM »
Forrest,

In many ways the people of Monticello have it better with the course and practice area being right in town. Not only is the course well outside of Williston, ND, making it a trip just to go play, but dropping by for some work on your game is pretty much out of the question.
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Jay Flemma

Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2006, 11:11:55 AM »
Garland, I enjoy Links of North deakota a great deal too.  Sure, It's not NGLA, but for $45, its gorgeous, has alot of interesting holes and options and features some great routing tricks in the fierce winds.

It'll take me a while to dig up what I wrote on it, but I'll write some more between dealing with Thanksgiving prep.

No I have not played hideout, but I played western colorado.  Lakota and Redlands are also excellent.

Bill_McBride

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2006, 11:18:43 AM »
I would like to get to both courses.  Forrest, those severely canted fairways at the Hideout look positively "Olympian!"   Driving is obviously a premium as it looks like errant tee shots could wind up in really bad places..

Tim Leahy

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #9 on: November 22, 2006, 12:07:02 PM »
I was just looking at my desk golf hole calendar and today's hole was the 10th at Hawktree in Bismark, ND.
What is your opinion of that course? I don't recall seeing anything written on this site about it and it looks very interesting. How does it compare with the two courses you discussed above?
I love golf, the fightin irish, and beautiful women depending on the season and availability.

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #10 on: November 22, 2006, 12:23:29 PM »
Tim,

If Jay does not come back and point you to his reviews, then you might IM him to ask. I did not get to Hawktree yet, but on future trips to visit family, I will for sure.
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Forrest Richardson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #11 on: November 22, 2006, 01:02:18 PM »
Jay — Thank you for remininf me of green fes. The Hideout is still $22 I believe. So, perhaps in that ratio of golf-to-cost, The Hideout scores high.
— Forrest Richardson, Golf Course Architect/ASGCA
    www.golfgroupltd.com
    www.golframes.com

Adam Clayman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #12 on: November 22, 2006, 01:58:14 PM »
How are the vistas in N.D?

The drop shot hole in Monticello is better than Garland describes. So is the 12th "Dodge".

Havent been to the northland yet, but I sense it could easily be in my future.

One critique on the method of comparison. It is important in what sequence the holes play. In this format, that aspect is not considered, which I believe is a mistake and leads to a hole by individual hole analysis of GCA, which I rally against.
Is this a vaccum Danny?

"It's unbelievable how much you don't know about the game you've been playing your whole life." - Mickey Mantle

Jay Flemma

Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #13 on: November 22, 2006, 06:32:03 PM »
I like hawktree...I wouldn't have picked 10 as a hole for a calender...maybe 12 or 15 or 5 or something.  But for $50 its an excellent bargain.  Throw in Bully pulpit and you have yourself a pleasanbt and in expensive little getaway.

Forrest, I promise to try to get to your course soon!

Paul Payne

Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #14 on: November 22, 2006, 07:25:21 PM »
Garland,

That was a great thread. We could all mince the details of your analysis but I have to say, that was one of the best defense / arguements I have ever seen posted. Nice work.

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #15 on: November 22, 2006, 07:33:59 PM »
Thanks Paul,

I would like to see more threads like it, and fewer of USC/ND, etc.

Now, I suppose you are either a Trojan or Irish, and I have just lost a fan.  ???
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #16 on: November 22, 2006, 07:39:08 PM »
...
One critique on the method of comparison. It is important in what sequence the holes play. In this format, that aspect is not considered, which I believe is a mistake and leads to a hole by individual hole analysis of GCA, which I rally against.
Is this a vaccum Danny?



I preferred the sequence/routing of The Links of ND over Hideout, also. Of course I considered doing them in hole order, but I don't feel that adds as much as comparing apples to apples.
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Paul Payne

Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #17 on: November 22, 2006, 07:46:02 PM »
I actually prefer the way you did your comparison. As you stated you can truly make an apples to apples comparison this way.

The interesting debate that would ensue is whether the routing on the losing course could be so strong that it could overcome its other defficiencies enough to win in the end.

By the way, not to worry, I am a lowly Purdue fan.

Forrest Richardson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #18 on: November 22, 2006, 10:50:02 PM »
Jay — Don't get there too quickly...The Hideout sits at 7,000 feet and I am certain snow will come any day now.

Apples-to-apples...? Really now.

Speaking as an author of an entire book on the subject of Routing, I hardly feel it appropriate that you ingnore routing and sequence in the comparison of courses. To do so is a thwart on one of the greatest hallmarks and design aspects of golf — routing.
— Forrest Richardson, Golf Course Architect/ASGCA
    www.golfgroupltd.com
    www.golframes.com

Bill_McBride

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #19 on: November 22, 2006, 10:59:04 PM »
Garland — That was an exciting "round", although I soon became discouraged that "I" was losing to a yardage book.  ;D

Quote of the week!  ;D

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #20 on: November 22, 2006, 11:57:01 PM »
...
Apples-to-apples...? Really now.

Speaking as an author of an entire book on the subject of Routing, I hardly feel it appropriate that you ingnore routing and sequence in the comparison of courses. To do so is a thwart on one of the greatest hallmarks and design aspects of golf — routing.

Don't forget Forrest, there are crab apples, domesticated apples, delicious apples, all more related than oranges are to apples.

Your book on routing arrived the other day from Amazon. Therefore, I plead ignorance for the time being, but I am making an effort to rectify that.
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Forrest Richardson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Kay's The Links of ND vs Richardson's Hideout
« Reply #21 on: November 23, 2006, 12:23:09 AM »
Congratulations. You are among the 4,000 owners!
« Last Edit: November 23, 2006, 12:23:21 AM by Forrest Richardson »
— Forrest Richardson, Golf Course Architect/ASGCA
    www.golfgroupltd.com
    www.golframes.com