John,
First, there are a lot of variables that we don't know so all the following is speculation. Second, do you have the yardage correct for #2 as you have the blues shorter than the whites?
Given a yardage of 6884, we can come up with the following.
The bogey rating is 94.3 given that Course Rating and Slope.
If the Obstacle Value was 0 and the rating was based strictly on yardage, the Course Rating would be 72.1, the Bogey Rating 93.7 and the slope 116. There is one major error in doing thing this way as we don't know what the Effective Playing Length is. If the course has a lot of downhill holes and the ball rolls more than normal and we are at an altitude above 2000 feet, the effective playing length could definitely be less than the measured length. But, given that the EPL is 6884, the Scratch Obstacle Value would be -.2 and the Bogey Obstacle Value would be +.6. While it is unusual to see a negative SOV, it is not unprecedented and since you say there is no OB and little water, it is possible.
At 6250 yards, the bogey rating is 91.0. If we again assume EPL equals the measured length, we get a Scratch Rating of 69.0, a bogey Rating of 89.6 and a slope of 111 based strictly on yardage. In this case, we have Scratch Obstacle Value of +.1 and a Bogey Obstacle Value of 1.4 in order to get the numbers we see in your post. It is somewhat unlikely that the Obstacle Values would be that much higher based on a shorter yardage, but if there were a number of doglegs that the players were forced to layup on at the shorter distances, it would increase the Effective Playing Length and make things closer.
Given your comments on the holes, I can see areas where these things come into play. For example, on #18, a bogey golfer would have a shot of 43 yards to the green for his fourth shot from the back while he would have a shot of 171 yards from the whites which would be a transition and they might lay him up. You don't say how far the water is in front of the green so I can't say what the reality is. Also, even though there is no OB, the long fescue rough could be classified as extreme rough which is weighted similarly. All in all, unless a lot of yards are taken off for holes like the 5th, I think the Obstacle Values are a little low, but not unprecedented. I can see how there might be more Obstacle Values for the shorter tees based on the length of shots into greens and the positioning of fairway bunkers etc.