"And, perhaps the 13th at ANGC."
By what standard is the 13th at Augusta quirky/controversial?
For me, quirk incorporates one and/or two themes explained in previous posts -- a highly unusual, man-made feature of a course (some aspects of greens design, e.g.), or the use of odd/unconventional land forms being utilized strategically in the design of a hole.
Jack Nicklaus, for one, referred to the 13th at ANGC as one of the most natural golf holes he'd ever played -- in that the hole was laid out to take advantage of the land as it was presented, and the land itself presented numerous strategic options. A shortish (even when it was built) par 5, with a creek bordering its entire left side, and the lay of the land making the 2nd shot easier (because of the level lie, as pointed out in a previous ANGC thread) the closer you flirt with the creek, and harder if you bail out to the right. The creek then cuts across the land, making the far side of the creek an obvious and natural green site. The creek is utilized strategically again, because it runs at an angle away from the player, and somewhat parallel to the length of the green -- the 2nd shot going for the green calls for a long fade, but creates greater risk. And should the player decide to lay up, the short approach shot is from uneven and perhaps a downhill lie.
Too obvious (but I'll say it anyway) caveat -- I've never seen or played the hole in person, only on TV and videotapes.