SL,
I do understand where you are coming from. I too enjoy variety and new things. It would be interesting to see Tiger knock down some ropers below the whipping winds. And from an architectural perspective only, given the choice of playing the K-Club or Royal County Down, well, is it really a choice?
My post was not prompted by Tommy's introductory comments or Brad Klein's analysis. The former is so inevitably biased
, and the latter is paid for his critical evaluations.
In many if not most cases, the venues chosen for important competitions can be second guessed (Hazeltine, Torrey Pines, Medinah, Valhalla immediately come to mind). Whatever considerations led to this particular choice, I have no reason to believe that the best interests of the sponsors, the hosting team, and their fans were not foremost. As important as the Ryder Cup might be to the U.S. team and its fans, I doubt that we have anything close to our European friends' emotional investment in the matches. I don't think the Europeans would do anything that would undermine their mission.
The selection has nothing to do with prostitution or million pound inducements. The Ryder Cup has evolved to a spectacle, probably way beyond what the founders intended. Arguably, the competition objective has been maximized, quite possibly at the expense of good fellowship. I am not sure that the selection of the K-Club vis-a-vis a more architecturally interesting links course has a negative impact on the betterment of golf. Perhaps what it really comes down to is that pure golf course architecture has a considerably lower priority among most than it does for us on this site.