News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Andy Hughes

Blue Mash (MD) Art Hills, with pics
« on: August 15, 2006, 09:46:27 AM »
Not a lot of commentary. On to the course (yardages are approximate).

First hole is a brute. 430 yards, slightly uphill and generally soft as is the rest of the course. I have played here 3-4 times over the last 3 years and it is always soft.
Helpful to carry the traps, but it is silly-long to do so. Safer play left leaves a longer, blinder approach. One of the tougher starting holes I have played (and the shot is into the early AM sun to add insult to injury)


Second hole eases up slightly. 420, to a wide fairway, and a more exacting approach:


Third, back to the grinder! 450 yards to a very wide fairway (some fairway-sharing with number 2--hidden on the left   by undulations). But the best approach comes from the far right, near a lonely fairway trap.


Looking back from behind the 3rd green down to the fairway.  Nice undulations on this green.
All in all, maybe the best hole here.


Number 7, 320 yards, though it varies quite a bit where the tees get placed.  Doglegs left at the end.  Safe play is to hit an iron or hybrid out there and wedge in.  Safer play out right leaves a tough angle into a shallow green that is raised.  From the right rough (the easy bailout), it can be almost impossible to hit and hold the green because of the rough and the uneven stance. Reward for being bold and getting around the corner is either hitting the green, or leaving a vastly simpler pitch up the length of  the green.


Number 8, another 280-300 yard par 4. (Guy in white shirt middle-left side of pic is on the green). Very tempting to pull the big stick. Generally makes more sense to lay something out to the right and go with the wedge as it easy to leave yourself in an awkward place being overbold. Good hole--lets you choose
your poison and rewards well-played shots.


Number 10, 380 yards. Attractive hole, with wispy long rough for visual emphasis but not really in play, and a pond straight-away to give pause to the very long hitter who does not bend his drive to the left.


Number 14, 370 yards.  I hate this hole. It has the silliest fairway I have ever seen.  It is perhaps ten yards wide or so until it reaches a fairway trap at the 230 mark, and then widens.  Silly looking and silly to play unless you can carry past the silliness.  The green sits nicely however for the approach, with some slopes to help work a ball to a back right pin, and a fallaway right to punish an over-bold shot that just leaks too much.


Some artistic sculpturing they used to divide the front and back nines:


Number 15, 410 yards. Doglegs right over/around a cluster of ugly over-round traps. Not attractive, but it plays nicely as you can carry the traps and shorten the approach, or stay left and tack your way from here to there. Pic from over the two-tier green.  Surrounds are shaved down to increase the options. It's a nice feature, though not common here.


Number 16, 450 yards. One of my other favorites.  Bends gently left around the fairway trap.  Safe play is obviously to stay
right of the trap, but that leaves a long approach shot that must carry the right greenside trap.  And a solid drive that stays right of the trap runs the risk of ending up long in the woods if hit more than, of, say 260-270 yards.  The reward for challenging the bunker is a much shorter approach and a better angle that goes more up the green rather than across it and that does not need to carry the bunker.


My general feeling is that there are several very good holes here that reward good plays and penalize bad ones. There are also some run-of-the-mill holes that fail to register. The par 5s are generally below average, with number 12, a reachable but dangerous hole, being the exception. The others are unattractive to my eye, and not terribly interesting.

I have not said much about the green contouring, but it is better than most around here--a number of greens have good interest to them and preferred places to hit to or away from.
"Perhaps I'm incorrect..."--P. Mucci 6/7/2007

Mark Bourgeois

Re:Blue Mash (MD) Art Hills, with pics
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2006, 01:53:24 PM »
Andy, thanks. Do you have any closeup pictures of 7 green? And is there a "run up" route if you hit driver on 8? It looks like there might be one over that pot far left but hard to tell.

Mark

Jerry Kluger

Re:Blue Mash (MD) Art Hills, with pics
« Reply #2 on: August 15, 2006, 02:27:11 PM »
Andy: I played Blue Mash and enjoyed it although it does have some very tough competition in the area.  The greens had good movement to them and there were strategies and different lines to play on most holes.  I would like to see a Hills course where the bunkers are more intimidating - in most instances they are flat and allow you to take the shortest route to the hole.  The better Hills public course in the area to me is Maryland National although I can't be very specific as to my reasons for saying so.  

Andy Hughes

Re:Blue Mash (MD) Art Hills, with pics
« Reply #3 on: August 15, 2006, 03:16:13 PM »
Mark, sorry, no, I do not have any pictures of the 7th green. If you are standing at 6 o'clock on the tee, then imagine the green is lined up on an axis from 7 to 1.  And if you are coming from right of the green, the target becomes rather skinny, with a bunker short right and a falloff towards the trees along the left.

This page at the Blue Mash site gives a diagram for #8.  There is no designed run-up at all. I don't even recall any area being cut at fairway height to encourage it. The play if feeling rather randy is to flail away and hope you either bounce through or over or past the trouble.
"Perhaps I'm incorrect..."--P. Mucci 6/7/2007

Andy Hughes

Re:Blue Mash (MD) Art Hills, with pics
« Reply #4 on: August 15, 2006, 03:50:09 PM »
Jerry, I agree entirely about the traps.  Most are rather benign and none are what I would call artistic.  With my sand game, however, I'd still rather avoid them! I do have to give credit where due however, and a number of them are placed just so, such as the crossing bunker on #5, the par 5.  It forces a choice especially if the drive has been missed or found the rough. Of course, the hole is still ugly...

Re Blue Mash vs Maryland National..I have only played MN once several years ago, but it feels kinda the same to me. Some holes I very much enjoyed, some were utterly blah and pedestrian. And a few felt poorly done.
"Perhaps I'm incorrect..."--P. Mucci 6/7/2007

Jesse Jones

Re:Blue Mash (MD) Art Hills, with pics
« Reply #5 on: August 15, 2006, 07:13:04 PM »
You should try Waverly Woods in Baltimore..Another AH effort..
It looks much different, but it would gather about the same review as BM..
« Last Edit: August 15, 2006, 07:13:27 PM by Jesse Jones »

Andy Hughes

Re:Blue Mash (MD) Art Hills, with pics
« Reply #6 on: August 16, 2006, 08:38:14 AM »
Jesse, I imagine one of these days I probably will make it over to Waverly Woods. I am sure I would find a number of holes I enjoy.
But I do have to say, Blue Mash seems bring 'em in, so maybe Hills is supplying what the golfers want. What strikes me is how quiet PB Dye was last month when I was there, and how much more I enjoyed the course. Not sure if it is location, price, the course or some combination, but Blue Mash is clearly busier.

Maybe soon I will break down and make the drive to Beechtree!
"Perhaps I'm incorrect..."--P. Mucci 6/7/2007

Tags: