Mike,
Surprisingly I don't think you are a course whore...I'm sorry but undertand why you would think that. I am simply not a fan of critics if they haven't had success in the field themselves. I don't get near as mad anymore on this site when people describe lost opportunities or failed potential...I'm used to it. But for a leading critic of our day to say the course he most prefers over any course ever built is one that was not built at all...got my goat. Truthfully, I think it was a hyperbolic lie...If you want to play cross country golf for eternity the Sheep Ranch isn't even in the same league as NGLA, or Cypress or my personal favorite ANGC. I guess it is my fault for taking your opinions to heart..
John,
Then perhaps I'm not making myself clear at all because I never said it was the best course in the world because I'm not even sure how it compares to other courses.
I tried to explain that it was largely about the beautiful site, the primal nature of the experience, and as George said, the incredible variety, where there are something like 144 possible holes to choose from that also benefit from the variations in weather and wind.
It's truly fascinating, John, and I wish you had seen it and played it because I think you'd feel much the same way.
As far as your comments about critics, I don't see myself as a critic. Instead, I think I'm a customer, or perhaps a patron, and since golf is a consumer driven business as well as an art form, I will tell you what I honestly think about a given course and appreciate when others here do the same.
And yes, I can understand your irritation when someone espouses on something they can't actually do themselves, but if that's the measure we're going to use, then all of us are flaming hyprocrites in all sorts of arenas every day of our lives; not just about golf course architecture.