Oakmont is so natural in its way, with the on-the-ground greens at #1,#3,#8,#9,#10,#12,#17 pre modification, that the idea of the "super-elevated" tees at #4 and #7 is really disturbing. But then you remember the history of Oakmont and it's okay -- apparently if Mr. Fownes saw a tee shot where he didn't think one should go, he had a bunker built overnight! Super tees to add needed length probably wouldn't bother him at all. Tom, was the extra length really necessary at #4? Seems they could pinch in the fairway bunkering and eliminate the driver. #7 at 12-13 stimp doesn't matter how long it is