Pine Valley has several holes with alternate greens.
In one instance, the greens mirror one another, in the other instance, they're quite diverse.
Pacific Dunes has a hole with alternate greens.
I believe that Trump's course in New Jersey originally had a hole with two greens.
In the discussion regarding architecture dictating green speed Jeff Brauer seemed torn between opposing forces, the creative force and the market force.
Wouldn't dual or alternate greens solve that problem ?
I know they're costly to construct and maintain, but, it would seem to allow the architect to do his "creative" thing, while at the same time allowing the owner to do their "market" thing.
It would be interesting to observe and poll golfers who had the opportunity to play to two greens, one highly contoured and/or sloped or to greens within a green, and the other benign, with moderate to minimal contour and/or slope.
My guess would be that the highly contoured, green within a green would be desired by the golfers, provided it was on a relatively short hole.
With all of the money being spent on the acquisition of land, design and construction, wouldn't this concept fit well within the framework of modern day golf courses ?
Wouldn't the golfers be better served ?
And, wouldn't the architects get an unbridled chance to produce creative, interesting, challenging yet fun products ?
Have any architects considered this concept in the last 5 years other than at PD ?