News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.

Pages: [1]   Go Down

John Foley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Protocol for posting pictures
« on: May 21, 2007, 08:18:01 PM »
Is there an accepted protocol for posting pictures of golf courses on this site? We see many of great pics, Ran's profiles have some fantastic ones and Frank Pont has started a great site, but outside of that is there an accepted protocol we should follow here in cyber-space?

Logged
Integrity in the moment of choice

Norbert P

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Protocol for posting pictures
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2007, 01:53:15 AM »
It is essential that the photograph has bunkers - with Fast and Firmly Maintained women rastlin' in 'em.   Bottom line, no pictures of guys like us.  
Logged
"Golf is only meant to be a small part of one’s life, centering around health, relaxation and having fun with friends/family." R"C"M

Mark_F

Re:Protocol for posting pictures
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2007, 04:50:03 AM »
Make sure they are the correct size so we don't have to scroll (too far) horizontally.

I think 700-800 pixels is about the appropriate width.
Logged

Michael Dugger

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Protocol for posting pictures
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2007, 04:57:10 PM »
Quote from: Mark Ferguson on May 22, 2007, 04:50:03 AM
Make sure they are the correct size so we don't have to scroll (too far) horizontally.

I think 700-800 pixels is about the appropriate width.

I disagree.

those little 640 x 480 picts. really do not give a feel for the architecture, IMHO.
Logged
What does it matter if the poor player can putt all the way from tee to green, provided that he has to zigzag so frequently that he takes six or seven putts to reach it?     --Alistair Mackenzie--
Pages: [1]   Go Up