News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Buck Wolter

  • Karma: +0/-0
Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« on: June 12, 2006, 08:34:08 AM »
Today's Wall Street has a golf section including the following:

Cult Classic

Tom Doak's book of course reviews is coveted
by golfers -- in part because he pulls no punches


Goes on to give some good background and quotes including one from Fazio.
Those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience -- CS Lewis

Philip Gawith

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2006, 10:28:18 AM »
Here is the aforementioned article, minus a few pictures.....

Cult Classic

Tom Doak's book of course reviews is coveted
by golfers -- in part because he pulls no punches

By CARRICK MOLLENKAMP
June 12, 2006; Page R13

Long before Tom Doak became a renowned designer of golf courses, he trotted around the globe critiquing them.

While a landscape-architecture student back in the 1980s, Mr. Doak started playing or walking through hundreds of golf courses throughout North America, the United Kingdom, Japan and New Zealand -- and took photographs and notes on each course's design. He later parlayed those notes and pictures into a travelogue-type book titled "The Confidential Guide to Golf Courses."

THE JOURNAL REPORT

 

1

See the complete Golf report2.

In the book, Mr. Doak reviewed the design features of more than 800 courses, from little-known links to some of the world's most famous and exclusive courses. He gave each a ranking of zero to 10 on what he called the Doak Scale. A zero, Mr. Doak wrote, is "a course so contrived and unnatural that it may poison your mind." But a 10 is "nearly perfect.... If you haven't seen all the courses in this category, you don't know how good golf architecture can get."

Mr. Doak never imagined it back then, but the book has become a cult classic -- a haven of bluntness in a sport that is often so clubby that it rarely criticizes itself. Its fame stems in part from the fact that only about 13,000 copies were printed back in the '90s and the book has been out of print for years. Due to the scarcity, available copies of the most recent edition are going for as much as $350.

No Encore

But while Mr. Doak's strong opinions resonate with golfers, they also have put him in somewhat of an awkward spot: Mr. Doak is now a high-profile part of the establishment he once unabashedly critiqued. And it's that reality that keeps him from reprinting or updating the sought-after book.

"I pulled no punches at all," Mr. Doak says in an interview. "I'm not sure I want to put myself in that position now."


 
RARE CANDOR In a clubby sport, Mr. Doak's guide stands out
 
Mr. Doak began playing golf as a child while traveling on business trips with his father. By the age of nine, he was hitting balls on the driving range. And it was during his studies at Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y., that Mr. Doak began visiting courses and taking notes and photographs.

After graduating from Cornell in 1982, Mr. Doak won a $5,000 scholarship that allowed him to spend a year in the British Isles. He put 13,000 miles on his used Fiat, going from one golf course to another. "I never slept in my car, but I sort of lived out of my car," he says. At one point he worked with the grounds crew at St. Andrews, a Scottish landmark and one of the world's oldest courses.

"I'd literally just ask in every town, 'Is there something down the road I should see?' " he says.

One path took him to the Addington, a course built in 1912 that today is a half-hour train and taxi ride from London's teeming financial district. The course, designed by J.F. Abercromby, is a classic, Mr. Doak later wrote in his book. "Its shot values are just as starkly defined as the transition from the fairway cut to a fearsome primary rough: either a shot is good enough or it isn't, and the course is the sole arbiter of justice."

He included the Addington in his "gourmet's choice" of 31 courses. (Mr. Doak says he picked 31 because he likes Baskin-Robbins and the ice-cream maker's original marketing pitch of 31 flavors.)

In 1983, Mr. Doak returned to the U.S. and went to work for Pete Dye, one of the game's top architects, whom Mr. Doak credits today for helping start his career.

Sparing No One

And he kept visiting courses. In October 1984, he visited Cedar Ridge Country Club in Broken Arrow, Okla. He gave it a 4 on the Doak scale and noted, "If the place has any character at all, I missed it. All I got from walking it was heat prostration."


 
AWKWARD SPOT As a course designer, Mr. Doak is now part of the establishment he critiqued
 
In 1986, Mr. Doak played the course at the Butler National Golf Club in Oak Brook, Ill., and then offered to show club members slides of other courses he had visited. The next thing club member Bill Shean knew, Mr. Doak was unpacking some 2,000 slides and a projector from his car.

"Tom was introverted back then," Mr. Shean says. "He put those slides up there and he became a different person.... It was a fascinating evening."

But the warm hospitality at Butler didn't mean the course wouldn't come in for criticism. Mr. Doak gave Butler a 6 and wrote: "Many of the individual holes are less than memorable, and a couple of the ones that are, are so because they're impossible."

Even legendary golf architect Tom Fazio wasn't spared. Mr. Doak dismissed as "vapid" Mr. Fazio's greens at the White Columns Country Club near Atlanta. "Clearly designed to impress the worst stereotype of the typical Atlanta yuppie golfer," Mr. Doak wrote.

But he did include Mr. Fazio's Shadow Creek course in Las Vegas on his list of 31. "I just hope that someday I have the opportunity to surpass it," Mr. Doak wrote of Shadow Creek, which was built in 1989 for casino owner Steve Wynn.

Asked about his critique, Mr. Doak says in an email: "I have high expectations for the best modern golf architects, and if they build a course that isn't too interesting, I believe someone should say something instead of giving them -- including me -- a free pass." Of White Columns, Mr. Doak says he saw the course only one time and "it's possible I missed something."

Mr. Fazio says he hasn't read the book but his team has read some of the comments about White Columns. He says he told his employees that Mr. Doak has a right to voice his views. "You can say whatever you want to say," Mr. Fazio says. "You don't have to agree with them."

Time to Write

In 1986, Mr. Doak quit Mr. Dye's firm to start his own design company. He says this is when he also had time to write the book.

He started typing his thoughts on the approximately 800 courses. He printed out initial copies of the book on a dot-matrix printer and sent the bound first edition to 40 people who had helped him along the way, as well as to his father. A second small printing followed in 1989.

"A couple [of people] were surprised or concerned that I was that critical of some golf courses," Mr. Doak says.

Scott Pool, a fellow architect who had worked with Mr. Doak, says it was typical Tom Doak. "He was very young and critical, and he called it like he saw it," says Mr. Pool, who lives in Atlanta. "He didn't butter it up."

Soon, pirated copies of the book began to make the rounds. This prompted Mr. Doak in 1994 to privately print 1,000 copies. As one way to make money, he later agreed to publish an illustrated edition with Sleeping Bear Press in Chelsea, Mich. The 361-page book came out in 1996, priced at $45.

Luke Reese, a private-equity executive in Chicago, says he and his friends exchanged the book as a Christmas gift in 1996. Then in 1997, they spent a year competing to see who could collect the most points based on the Doak Scale. Playing a course rating, say, a 5 would earn them five points.

"Tom Doak actually sent me a framed letter congratulating me on accumulating the most Doak points," says Mr. Reese, who collected more than 150. He says he doesn't always agree with Mr. Doak but appreciates that at least he is honest.

In the late 1990s, the book went out of print, in part because Mr. Doak decided not to revise it. Mr. Doak says that by then, he was building his reputation as an architect and was concerned how such a book would be perceived by fellow architects. His contract with Sleeping Bear specified that the rights reverted to the author after the book was out of print for two years, so Mr. Doak took over the publishing rights.

But perceptions don't seem to have hurt Mr. Doak's ability to get work. Ted Lennon, the senior vice president of Lowe Destination Development Inc., a Los Angeles developer, calls Mr. Doak's book influential. "I agreed with his thought process," says Mr. Lennon, who hired Mr. Doak to design Stone Eagle Golf Club in Palm Desert, Calif. But the key, Mr. Lennon says, is that Mr. Doak spent hours in broiling heat walking the canyons and ravines of the land for Stone Eagle's 6,801-yard course, instead of just relying on a topography map.

Restaurateur Jeff Shearer says he hired Mr. Doak to design the Lost Dunes course just outside Chicago because he liked Mr. Doak's minimalist approach and hands-on style. Lost Dunes is a 6,875-yard private course.

Mr. Doak's other designs include Pacific Dunes, just outside Bandon, Ore., and the Cape Kidnappers course in New Zealand. He worked with Jack Nicklaus on Sebonack Golf Club, which opened last month in Southampton, N.Y.

Pricey Reference

Today, those who own the book -- and are willing to part with it -- want a price comparable to the cost of a round at Pebble Beach. Booksellers offering it through Amazon.com want as much as $350.

John Sabino, the owner of Valuable Book Group in Princeton Junction, N.J., an Internet-based rare-book dealer that specializes in golf books, says owners of "The Confidential Guide to Golf Courses" tend to hold on to the book as a reference guide. He says the book is exceptionally frank, setting it apart in a field where "everybody says every course is great."

Mr. Sabino says he recently sold a copy of the 1996 version for $250. And he has a copy of the first edition that Mr. Doak professionally printed listed for $950.


PThomas

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2006, 10:46:01 AM »
I like the idea of collecting Doak points

boy, Tom is sitting on a gold mine if he ever decides to reprint and/or update it!
199 played, only Augusta National left to play!

Peter Pratt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2006, 11:13:26 AM »
I have one copy of the pre-Sleeping Bear Press book, but, alas, I have written all over it. Not that I'd sell it anyway...


Tommy_Naccarato

Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2006, 06:26:19 PM »
Something else Fazio hasn't ever read or seen, just like he has never read or seen a post from Golf Club Atlas.....

(Insert fish hook into mouth)

Why is this man continually being given credit as being the best designer in modern golf today? Honestly. It's all such man-made bullpucky, from the courses to the rhetoric, sure it's great that he is so successful, but look at the cost, driving-up fees to build while the Sport languishes from people who want to pony-up that kind of cash for one round of golf, let alone a country club membership that allows them to act like 400 individual assholes. (sorry for the verbiage, but enough is enough!)

Is it any wonder that golf design and construction needs a housing plan for survival? Look at the extent of what Fazio has built, setting the bar of both earthmovement, irrigation, etc. and then think of just how much of all of that is really neccessary for long term growth and sustenance.

I'm sorry for diluting what is a great article on Tom D. and his previous accomplishments, which have no doubt furthered the growth and knowledge of the Sport and it's courses. Thank God someone had the balls to do it with guys like Tom Fazio and his spinmakers in the world working against it in the opposite direction!

I know, I know, what do I know. He's a great family man. Hell of a nice guy. Just an old country hayseed from Hendersonville with a bunch of great kids who grew-up playing at the Boy's & Girls Club of Hendersonville.

Ed Gulewitz

Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2006, 03:30:37 PM »
I wish I could say I know that Fazio is bad or good for golf. I don't really know.  I have played a few Fazio tracks and like them okay.  The closest in my town is The Missouri Bluffs in the St.Louis Metro area.  

http://www.mobluffs.com/page/304-12883.htm

It is about to go fully private this year.  I like this tract, not because it is difficult, its not, but because it is beautiful.  The course feels more insulated than most St. Charles County courses, and that is a plus, since this is not a residential project.

I have played Hilton Head's Fazio @ Palmetto Dunes as well, but went back for seconds on the Arthur Hills at PD.  Something about that course drew me in more, and to see the refresh of the RTJ as well.

If Fazio is merely a "yes" man as some contend, then he will suffer from what he is accused of now...his designs will be retooled and reworked into something else in the future.  If he designs and does so because he loves the game, then I believe we will see more in his designs as they mature, but if he is designs through associates, autoCAD only, and doesn't care what he creates, then the criticism is merited.

scott_wood

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2006, 05:38:58 PM »
Tom's pre Sleeping Bear edition was a run of 1000 in a maroon red cover, all of which  came numbered and personally signed by Tom  .....no estimate of their value in the WSJ article....thoughts?

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2006, 05:44:25 PM »
Scott:

If you are thinking of selling one for profit I will hunt you down.

The most I've heard of one being sold for was $850, but that was at a charity auction.

Tony_Muldoon

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #8 on: June 13, 2006, 05:49:52 PM »
What the article fails to say is that prices can go down as well as up.

What price a second hand Confidential Guide once the all new 'Milliners Guide to Golf Courses', featuring the revolutionary Shirt Scale, hits the stores? ; ::)
Let's make GCA grate again!

Mike McGuire

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #9 on: June 13, 2006, 07:28:50 PM »
I mistakingly bought two copies of the 1994 edition from Tom Doak. (I thoght 31 falvors was a different title)  Both are signed to me and numbered.

I would like to sell one copy and donate the proceeds to golfclubatlas.com

Tom Doak was contacted and was ok with it.

If there is anyone that would like to put it on ebay let me know. I will mail you the book.

Mike McGuire

Willie_Dow

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #10 on: June 13, 2006, 09:10:30 PM »
Let's get back to the archictecture, and the guy who put it all together.  Doak is number one on this score!  Now we go forward.  Who is the next providor, and why?

scott_wood

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #11 on: June 13, 2006, 11:28:41 PM »
Tom NO WAY it's for sale!!
 I have both versions , but the signed # 161 will be bequested to a special friend!!

Ron Farris

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #12 on: June 13, 2006, 11:37:28 PM »
Tom D.
I am not sure if you remember me asking you about what golf courses to see on my first trip to Scotland and Ireland.  You faxed me a portion of your material you were compiling for Confidential Guide book.  The fax came from Dye Designs office.  i ended up traveling with my wife and first child so I didnt get to see what courses I wanted but I have always cherrished that act of kindness and consideration on your part.  I still have that fax but the ink is fading away.  As for the books - THANKS TOM.
REF

John Kavanaugh

Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #13 on: June 14, 2006, 08:43:09 AM »

Sport languishes from people who want to pony-up that kind of cash for one round of golf, let alone a country club membership that allows them to act like 400 individual assholes. (sorry for the verbiage, but enough is enough!)



Tommy,

Is it just members of Fazio courses that are assholes....When looking at the most expensive modern courses to join..I just don't see that many Fazio's at the top of the list.  

Dan Kelly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #14 on: June 14, 2006, 08:57:46 AM »
Scott:

If you are thinking of selling one for profit I will hunt you down.

Tom --

I don't understand this comment. Would you please clarify? Thank you.

Dan
"There's no money in doing less." -- Joe Hancock, 11/25/2010
"Rankings are silly and subjective..." -- Tom Doak, 3/12/2016

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #15 on: June 14, 2006, 09:13:37 AM »
Dan:

I've sold several of those books in recent years at way below the market price, just because people could not find the real book for less than $350, and I wanted them to be able to read it.  However, I've asked everyone to promise not to resell their book for profit.  In at least one instance, someone turned right around and sold the book on eBay for a tidy profit ... so now the remaining copies are not for sale unless I know someone personally.  [The guy who resold the book is sort of the Richard Reid of GCA, everyone has to take off their shoes forevermore because of one jerk.]

My comment to Scott was facetious, I don't have time to hunt him down, but it does bother me that people are trying to take advantage of the short supply of books.  Price-gouging is a bad thing in any endeavour.

Dan Kelly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #16 on: June 14, 2006, 10:02:31 AM »
Dan:

I've sold several of those books in recent years at way below the market price, just because people could not find the real book for less than $350, and I wanted them to be able to read it.  However, I've asked everyone to promise not to resell their book for profit.  In at least one instance, someone turned right around and sold the book on eBay for a tidy profit ... so now the remaining copies are not for sale unless I know someone personally.  [The guy who resold the book is sort of the Richard Reid of GCA, everyone has to take off their shoes forevermore because of one jerk.]

My comment to Scott was facetious, I don't have time to hunt him down, but it does bother me that people are trying to take advantage of the short supply of books.  Price-gouging is a bad thing in any endeavour.

Tom --

Thanks for the explanation. (I knew the comment was facetious, by the way! Just didn't understand the spark for the facetiousness.)

This is a wonderful analogy: "[The guy who resold the book is sort of the Richard Reid of GCA, everyone has to take off their shoes forevermore because of one jerk.]"

I am not schooled in the intricacies of the Confidential Guide -- so I don't understand why you and/or your publisher don't unilaterally end the supply shortage that makes reselling and price "gouging" possible.

Why not reissue the book? Give the proceeds to a good cause!

----------------

A little story:

The only time I've seen the "Confidential Guide" was in ... 1997, must have been, on a beautiful, beautiful Friday evening in late August. (State Fair time here in Minnesota.)

I was at the Barnes & Noble store in Woodbury -- for two very lonely hours. I was there to autograph copies of the book I'd recently published.

I don't think a single soul ventured indoors on that beautiful, beautiful Friday evening. The store was deserted.

I know for a fact that no one came back to my little table, to have me autograph a book!

Pretty funny, really. Seemed so even at the time.

Sometime early in those long two hours on that beautiful, beautiful Friday evening, I wandered over to the Sports section, to check out the golf books -- and there I found your "Confidential Guide." I took it back to my little table and paged through it for the rest of the two hours -- stealing an occasional longing glance toward the front doors. Nothing doing there!

I remember looking up your assessment of Sand Hills -- which I had visited, for the first and possibly the last time, in September 1996. Based on my very limited exposure to the world's storied courses, I thought it surely must be the greatest course in all the world.

Do I remember correctly that you gave it a 9 -- saying that it might someday soon warrant a 10? That's what I remember, anyway -- and I remember thinking either that you'd gotten it wrong, or that there must be some phenomenal golf courses out there in the world that I sure hoped to see someday.

I would have bought the book that night -- but it was kind of expensive (35, 40, 50 bucks?) ... and I hadn't made a dime that night!

LOL.
« Last Edit: June 14, 2006, 10:04:12 AM by Dan Kelly »
"There's no money in doing less." -- Joe Hancock, 11/25/2010
"Rankings are silly and subjective..." -- Tom Doak, 3/12/2016

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #17 on: June 14, 2006, 10:13:20 AM »
Dan:

I did a book signing in Traverse City for The Confidential Guide ten years ago, and had one person come in.

Apparently my fellow citizens did not appreciate the investment value of the book at that time.  I bet they're kicking themselves now.

Regarding a reprint, Sleeping Bear Press no longer exists, and I have the rights back for the book.  Reprinting it as published would be easy and inexpensive, though I don't really think I would sell more than 500 or 1000 copies of the book as is.  What everyone really wants to see is an update -- everyone except my fellow architects, that is.  Luckily for them, I make a lot more as a golf architect than I could as a publisher, so there is little incentive for me to republish the book right now.  But it's an uneasy truce, especially considering that the text for an update is right on this very laptop I'm typing into.  :)

P.S.  I typed Mr. Reid's name with a pause, you never know what mailing list you might get on nowadays.

PThomas

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #18 on: June 14, 2006, 10:16:20 AM »
I've told you before and I'll tell you again, Tom, I would love to see an updated edition

I think you far underestimate how many copies you would sell...
199 played, only Augusta National left to play!

John Kavanaugh

Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #19 on: June 14, 2006, 10:17:09 AM »
If Doak is a Doak 8 as a critic...what is he as an architect..

Dan Kelly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #20 on: June 14, 2006, 10:36:24 AM »
Apparently my fellow citizens did not appreciate the investment value of the book at that time.  I bet they're kicking themselves now.

Mine aren't!

Regarding a reprint, Sleeping Bear Press no longer exists, and I have the rights back for the book.  Reprinting it as published would be easy and inexpensive, though I don't really think I would sell more than 500 or 1000 copies of the book as is.

I think you're wrong there -- but I have personal experience of overestimating the market for books, so don't listen to me.

I wonder, though: Couldn"t you make it even easier and more inexpensive (virtually, so to speak, risk-free) by republishing it electronically? Isn't Stephen King doing that nowadays?

I don't remember how much artwork was in the original. That might affect its feasibility as an e-book. On the other hand: If you published it electronically, you could include links to various Web sites (including www.golfclubatlas.com) where readers could see pictures of the courses with their own eyes.

What everyone really wants to see is an update -- everyone except my fellow architects, that is.

I know you're wrong here -- because I, for one, want to see the original ... before you had any potential conflicts of interest between your work as an architect and your work as a critic.

Call me cynical, but I don't think any update could have quite the credibility of the original. No offense intended -- but how could you, or anyone, possibly be expected to be completely fair and as objective as possible not only about your competitors' efforts, but also about your own?

I want to see the original, unupdated "Confidential Guide" because, in this small world of golf-course architecture, like it or not, it's an historical document.

It should be widely available, somehow.
"There's no money in doing less." -- Joe Hancock, 11/25/2010
"Rankings are silly and subjective..." -- Tom Doak, 3/12/2016

Gene Greco

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #21 on: June 14, 2006, 10:56:48 AM »

Dan:

     Tom Doak has since given Sand Hills a 10 (along with Pacific Dunes).

 He gave it a 9 BEFORE THE COURSE WAS FINISHED!

« Last Edit: June 14, 2006, 08:44:03 PM by Gene Greco »
"...I don't believe it is impossible to build a modern course as good as Pine Valley.  To me, Sand Hills is just as good as Pine Valley..."    TOM DOAK  November 6th, 2010

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #22 on: June 14, 2006, 11:08:47 AM »
Dan:

If there is more "conflict of interest" today than there was in 1996, the conflict is that I'm more likely to hedge my opinion today so that people won't think I'm dissing another architect to gain market share for myself.  Maybe that does make my newer stuff less worth reading.

Maybe the #1 reason I don't print an update is so I don't have to write about my own courses.  I don't think there is a conflict of interest there -- everyone reading is well aware that I might be biased on the subject of my own work, and will read it with a grain of salt.  The real problem is that when I was self-critical about my own work in the previous book, it offended my clients, many of whom seem to believe that ridiculous overstatements of the quality of our work are part of the fee.  [This is especially true today, even though my contract doesn't say anything like that; it's just an accepted part of the business that prominent architects will lie through their teeth about how good their work is.]  That's also why I have had to duck Jon Cummings' thread about ranking my courses -- I feel like I know them better than he does, but there are somewhere between 4 and 18 clients who would be pissed off if I didn't put them first on my own list.

Dan Kelly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #23 on: June 14, 2006, 11:27:16 AM »
If there is more "conflict of interest" today than there was in 1996, the conflict is that I'm more likely to hedge my opinion today so that people won't think I'm dissing another architect to gain market share for myself.  Maybe that does make my newer stuff less worth reading.

That is precisely what I meant.

The real problem is that when I was self-critical about my own work in the previous book, it offended my clients, many of whom seem to believe that ridiculous overstatements of the quality of our work are part of the fee.  [This is especially true today, even though my contract doesn't say anything like that; it's just an accepted part of the business that prominent architects will lie through their teeth about how good their work is.]  That's also why I have had to duck Jon Cummings' thread about ranking my courses -- I feel like I know them better than he does, but there are somewhere between 4 and 18 clients who would be pissed off if I didn't put them first on my own list.

1. Maybe we can get Tom Wolfe to go to work on a "Bonfire of the Vanities" remake, set in the world of golf.

2. I'm seeing that Jack Nicholson character ShivaS had (still has?) on his posts, from "A Few Good Men," screaming: "You can't handle the truth!"
"There's no money in doing less." -- Joe Hancock, 11/25/2010
"Rankings are silly and subjective..." -- Tom Doak, 3/12/2016

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re:Confidential Guide in the WSJ
« Reply #24 on: June 14, 2006, 02:32:23 PM »
Mark:

When I began to study golf architecture seriously (when I was 18 or 19), there weren't so many places to read about it or to have my opinion shaped beforehand ... so when I went to what were considered great courses, I analyzed them without many prejudices (apart from my own feelings about golf) to try to figure out what made them tick.

I have often thought how lucky I was to get to see all those courses (including my year overseas) before I had worked in an architect's office and been "taught" what was good or bad.  I think in that sense the gist of Eckstein's post about mentors was right ... most designers' mentors teach them "what it's supposed to be about" for better or worse, whereas I had the opportunity to decide for myself.  

The tough part is that those opinions about other great courses are the foundation of my own design style, so anything that I write now sounds like it is a defense of my style, instead of just an opinion about how golf and golf courses should be.

I do wish other knowledgable people were able to "take off the governor" as you say.  It's a shame someone like Mike Strantz never really wrote much about what he was doing, or that Ben Crenshaw can't share his deep feelings about golf architecture without risking his reputation as a nice guy (and if I'd enjoyed his reputation for the latter, I wouldn't have written what I did, either).  When I wrote my book I really felt like I was giving voice to opinions that were felt by others but left unsaid.

[review of The Jockey Club deleted by author]



« Last Edit: June 14, 2006, 03:15:28 PM by Tom_Doak »