Sean, I hadn't heard that rumor of moving the Links clubhouse
to the area of the maintenance facility. You are right, that is
one of the all time great maintenance facilities. It is almost repulsive to me to think that anyone
would seriously consider such a switch in one of the really unique routings in golf. By that I refere specifically
to the second nine that goes 3,5,3,5,3,4,4,4,5. the front nine is a solid routing that is a medium long but easy par
4 dogleg to a remarkable green knoll
that sets the tone of the day. The next is the blind tee shot
through a notch, and then dogleg right down through interesting FW bunkering and another excellent green.
The third, would not be as good opening hole. It is a good hole, but the setting wrong for an opener IMO. Then followed by a
par 3 redan and a par 5 is not a good pace of opening holes.
You are right about the oddity of the staff somehow being
surprised about the idea that someone is more enthusiastic
about the Links than the Woodlands course. It is a sort of
microcasm of the lack of the general golfing public knowing what
constitutes a great golf experience. They want woods, and
ponds, and flat greens and fair well maintained bunkers.
Perhaps the issue is the management of the course facility. The
American Baptist Assembly is the owner-operator of the golf resort. I doubt they have anyone truly knowledgeable on their
Board of Directors overseeing Lawsonia. That is probably the reason
that they had allowed the course to become as tree infested and
the Links to get away from them in the first place, until the super
had the forsight to bring Ron Forse and Jim Nagle in to give them
a clue as to the gem they had, and how it should be presented.
I shutter to think if they are seriously thinking of a re-routing...
If they do, it is just one more example of idiots running golf,
and ruining it.