Reading the Sutton Bay review reveals once again that Ran has a real ability to write golf course architecture reviews better than anyone that I have seen, and his brother was pretty close. For me, Ran's reviews were what drew me to GCA.com.
Playing and speaking with Ran last year, I am always amazed at his ability to remember details of courses that he has played once or twice compared to some that I have seen many times and can barely remember.
Now with family committments, the reviews are less in number which may make them more meaningful as he has to pick and choose his spots. I am curious to hear peoples opinions of their reach in terms of:
1. Highlighting a new or unknown architect;
2. Highlighting features for architects who post or lurk;
3. Marketing a new course. I know this is not Ran's intent, but can he influence membership numbers with a review? These reviews often bring raters from larger publications with wider circulations than the 1500 plus lurkers here;
3. Restoration trends of older courses?
Will Top 100 ever be replaced by "Ran Reviewed on GCA.com" or are they simply read by a few hundred golf geeks who would jump in a plane to see any old Doak 5 ?