Andy,
You bring up some good points. I am trying to figure out what it takes as well. I am not trying to demean anyone who does restoration work, but I would think that it is very difficult to do a great job or a horrible one. Is this the correct thinking? I don't think that it is too tough to go to Oakland Hills and change a few things around and still have a great golf course. I still am in need of some information about #5 at Inverness, I still don't know who hacked that up, but I suspect it was Hills. #6 too, I think. I am not saying that these clubs are making the wrong choice-wait yes I am, I am also just saying that I find it hard to believe that the members at a course like Burning Tree have really done their homework if they brought in Hills. Maybe they did there homework in the area, but like I said, how bad can you f--- up Congressional or Bethesda? I just can't imagine playing Pipestone or Legendary Run or Fox Run or Longaberger or any of that other crap and saying 'Here you go Hills, here you have carte blanche at our quality club' Another thing, it is not like Hills does a hell of a lot of private courses from the beginning, why let him work on a masterpiece, isn't that abnormal? I don't see the pro from Pipestone leaving for the Head position at Scioto, why Hills?