Glenn states it too strongly using the word terrorize to describe Mr. Hills' work. However, I played Longaberger last summer and though it did have some very good holes and at least one great green, it was in general disappointing given the land the course sits on.
I don't remember the holes off the top of my head, but the worst hole there IMO was the downhill par 5 that was guarded by water right, and gully/brush/trees left. No rational person would go for that green in two with more than a five iron, and yet the layup was a very short iron if you decided to take three shots to get to the green. The target of the green on the second shot was just super small.
The par 3 that followed that hole had an interesting green that completely fooled me. I watched my ball break about 6 feet more than I could see. Hills had at least 2-3 other greens that were very tricky to figure out. Kudos to him for that. The hole after the par 3 (I think) was a shortish dogleg right hole with a most interesting green. The left side of the green in front sloped toward you, and then about 1/3 to 1/2 of the way into the green it went away from you. The left side and general sloped down to the right, and I seem to remember a nice back right pin position that would be a doozy to get to with the bunkers guarding the green on the right side.
All in all, Longaberger is a decent course, but a little overpriced for the architecture you are seeing. I feel the land was worthy of a better course. Of course I don't know any of the issues that were faced with the site or what the client's wishes were with that project.