|
Bill_McBride
|
 |
« Reply #35 on: September 18, 2005, 08:49:14 AM » |
|
Tom, I think I know what you mean, some of those fairway edge cuts are just too precise, sort of like origami! But what a spectacular course.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I have never had as much fun as golfing with GCAers. So if I can swing it I am in." -- Stan Dodd, 2/18/2010. I agree!
|
|
|
|
Sean Arble
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: September 18, 2005, 09:50:25 AM » |
|
TMac
I know what you mean. The course seems overly fussy from the newer photos. But look at those seemless elavation changes! The forward tee at number 18 is fantastic how the land from behind just flows forward. The same is true of ridge pathway to the left of the 15th fairway (the photo with the large tree in the foreground). This is magnificent stuff.
Thanks a load Paul and Brian. Great stuff.
Ciao
Sean
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
THE NEXT DOZEN: Brancaster, Silloth, Ganton, Berkshire Red, Pulborough, Sunningdale Old, Deal, Crystal Downs, Kingsley Club, Franklin Hills, Pasatiempo & Cypress Point
|
|
|
|
Tom_Doak
|
 |
« Reply #37 on: September 18, 2005, 10:43:09 AM » |
|
When the greens were rebuilt 15-20 years ago, all of them were enlarged from Colt's original plans, out of fear that the smaller greens would not perform well with the combination of heat, humidity, and traffic. They tried to be faithful to the original design, but none of today's putting surfaces are really the work of Colt and Alison ... just an interpretation of their plans by a Japanese designer.
Also, one of the recent photos is mis-labeled ... what's listed as the par-3 7th hole is actually the 5th. The "Devil's Divot" is still there at #7 but there is no photo of it among the last bunch.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 18, 2005, 10:45:32 AM by Tom_Doak »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Brian_Ewen
|
 |
« Reply #38 on: September 18, 2005, 11:31:11 AM » |
|
Tom I spent ages trying to figure out if that was 5th or the 7th , as it didnt look right to me , but it was originally labelled that way , and the holes looked similar in Pauls original post , so I left it as it was .
Is that definitely the 9th green , as it didnt look right to me either .
Thanks. Brian
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tom_Doak
|
 |
« Reply #39 on: September 18, 2005, 11:53:29 AM » |
|
Brian:
Actually the first photo you have labeled "9th" might be the par-3 7th ... a bit hard to tell from back in the trees, but I'm pretty sure that's right.
The second photo labeled 9th green looking back, is correct I think. I don't remember the hole that well, but it does come back up to the clubhouse and the green is built up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Paul_Turner
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: September 23, 2005, 03:33:55 PM » |
|
I'm amazed that AOL are still hosting those pics! Bit small now.
Brian
Thanks for the contrasting pics. The 13th is better from the old angle.
Alison did highly detailed green drawings for Tokyo (they're in the club history) I assume he did similar ones for Hirono. I wonder how accurate the architect was the were expanded?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Keith Durrant
Full Member
 
Offline
Posts: 283
I love GCA!
|
 |
« Reply #41 on: September 24, 2005, 12:51:45 AM » |
|
Paul, what's the source for the pictures - an old club handbook?
Please could they be saved as a course profile? This is certainly my favourite thread.
If ever there is a case of keeping tree density thinner to open up vistas, this must be it.
The old 13th, just cries out to be played.
Also the old 12th, the spectacular "pebble beach 18th", with the open view of the lake from the tee. This is in contrast to the current hole with the trees and shrubs along the lake-shore, on the inside of the dogleg.
One can only speculate where this course would be in the "world rankings" if still in its original form, but surely much higher than its present position.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 24, 2005, 12:57:43 AM by Keith Durrant »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Sweeney
|
 |
« Reply #42 on: March 01, 2008, 08:31:21 PM » |
|
A couple of people asked me if I was Top 100 golfer today! I am not, but Joe does post here.
I thought I would bring up this classic post for the new guys.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Advice from Uncle Gibby, "Good point. Maybe I've got to stop reading these threads after having wine with dinner."
|
|
|
|
David Stamm
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: March 02, 2008, 10:41:54 AM » |
|
Mike, thanks for bringing this thread back up! I've always wanted to see more of Hirono. Alison's work there looks pretty damn solid, IMHO. These are the kind of threads that make this site great.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The object of golf architecture is to give an intelligent purpose to the striking of a golf ball."- Max Behr
|
|
|
|
John Mayhugh
|
 |
« Reply #44 on: March 02, 2008, 11:59:09 AM » |
|
Great repost. I will be in Kobe later this week but no trip to Hirono is included. So far the only way I have found to play there is through a tour operator. Expensive but I guess that is to be expected.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Patrick Kiser
Full Member
 
Offline
Posts: 636
One shot at a time...
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: March 02, 2008, 10:41:42 PM » |
|
Yes, fantastic before and after. Thanks for sharing.
These folks could really use some tips on tree clearing though...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“One natural hazard, however, which is more or less of a nuisance, is water. Water hazards absolutely prohibit the recovery shot, perhaps the best shot in the game.” —William Flynn, golf course architect
|
|
|
|