Anthony:
I, too, am surprised about your views about Cuscowilla and Crabapple. My personal thoughts on Crabapple (almost the total opposite of yours!).
- To me, the club would be a fantastic place to entertain clients. They'd be impressed by the clubhouse, practice area, and overall scale of the place. When playing customer golf where everyone shows up 90 minutes ahead to have lunch, hit balls, look around the shop, etc., then after play you head to the grill for a beer, it's VERY good. However, if I had to play it as my home course, I'd find myself getting bored.
- I found the course to be much easier than it looked (isn't this often the knock on Fazio and crew?). I did play it from as far back as possible, and didn't feel like I was overly challenged at any time. Actually, I thought there were a few holes where I could put on a blindfold and not worry about making worse than par. You might think I'd have a higher opinion of a course where I scored so well!!
- I didn't see anything that inclined me to think that the boss spent more time on site than other Fazio courses of recent vintage. There wasn't a whole lot strategically that had me eager to make a return trip any time soon. Cuscowilla, on the other hand, is a place where I'd make a special trip because I find it to be much more strategic.
- I think the average trunk-slammer that get's invited once a year to a private club by his boss is going to LOVE CCC-Crabapple, because he doesn't get that kind of overall aesthetic presentation that often. On the other hand, if you take the same guy to Cuscowilla, he's going to wonder what the big deal is because he wasn't impressed by the practice facilities, enormous clubhouse and huge features.
That's the beauty of CCC though. I think they've hit their target audience of corporate entertainment very well.
I also think that their slate roof on the clubhouse cost more than my house
All the best,
Doug