Paul - I agree that harborside is nothing special, but I wouldn't characterize it as awful. A 4 on the Doak scale.
But the land pre-construction (a trash dump) would certainly be characterized as an eyesore.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48012/480127425be7947895157212f35e1340f2810c60" alt="Shocked :o"
Jeff - I agree that a few strip malls don't meet the eyesore threshhold.
Mike and Jay - Having not played Lytham, I wonder if the ugliness around the course evolved after the course was designed? I guess one could argue that there's no such thing as an ugly piece of linksland, regardless of the surrounds
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/935a6/935a60686fe1a85e316a1f83a06413cd77cbe61b" alt="Wink ;)"
In fact, I can't really think of a top 100-type course that was built recently on eyesore land. Althought the idea sounds good - take a blighted piece of property and put it to good use - I suspect that it's very difficult to do (environmental, lack of terrain, safety, cost to make the place look good).
All of this is to say that I really think a course's ranking (official or popularity contest) depends more on it's natural surrounds than people think.
I just saw that the're getting 450 Euros for 36 at Old Head. Yikes.