Jordan Wall's thread about Pine Valley got me wondering...
Everyone knows that playing a course (several times in different weather) is the only REAL way to learn the merits of a golf course, but how should those who cannot play a course learn about it?
For some courses, it will surely remain next to impossible, but what about the true classics? Pine Valley is considered by many to be the best in the world but what information is out there which might give those of us who haven't played it a more thurough understanding of its merits?
What can be done? What types of material have you, as aficianadoes longed for but have not found? I don't know if any of you ever went throw the GolfVR Web tours of Bethpage and Olympia Fields which were put online during US Opens. The provided 360 VR panoramas from all the tees, 200, 150 and greens of the par 5's, tees, 150 and greens of the par 4's and tees and greens of the par 3's. Accompanying each view was a recorded audio commentary from the club pro about what you were seeing and how it should or could be played. I found that it gave me an amazing sense of having walked the courses.
I'd like to see more of these done for some of the great courses.
I'd also like to see more of the hole break-downs like the one done here a while back on Riviera's 10th. Careful commentary, combined with illustrations and photos can be very instructive and interesting as well.
In the way of 'great courses', I have played only Thompson's St. George's and Highlandslinks. But just those two have given me a lot to go on, and certainly given me enough information to ask reasonable questions. But there are always going to be courses that we just CANNOT get to play.
So how can we learn from them? Or can we?