There a lot of holes which have fairway bunkers that are so short from the tee that they are basically irrelevant to any decent player. Basically, throughout the entire round, your ability to drive the ball is never challenged – you can pretty much hit it anywhere at Rackham.
I agree with Jeff that the back nine is more interesting than the front nine. If the greens were maintained at a little quicker pace, a few of the greens on the back nine (e.g. 12, 14, 15, & 16) could be quite challenging.
I would have liked to have seen the course prior to the redesign to facilitate the construction of I-696. At one point it was good enough to host a US Public Links (in the early 60’s, I believe). I think they were left with inadequate acreage to do anything great with the first six holes.
Overall, it is a pretty average golf course, but a solid value for the rate they charge. It is a shame the condition of the course, particularly the bunkers, is not maintained to a higher standrd.