Jeff, the VoS and a Barritz swale? Wouldn't we be more accurate to call them features than hazards? Isn't Forrest compiling a list a glossary of golf terms? What does Forrest say on this point.
Semantics perhaps? Look at the thread on green contouring a while back. Modern challenge must be created (for the highest level golfers) with green contouring that accepts or rejects shots, as bunkers are now "too far away" from the dispersion pattern to affect strategy. If green contour is the main challenge, isn't a a hazard?
Maybe the Biaritz swale, completely within the green is a feature, but the VofS is partly outside the green, just like it was a bunker, but with one more option - putting, so I don't care what Forrest thinks
- I think its a hazard.
I have used the valley of sin on several greens, usually short par 4's similar to TOC 18. Golfers moan like crazy, saying its a goofy recovery that they don't have a chance to practice, "because its different." (I said, "That's the point (and under my breath, added "jackass." I hope he didn't hear that!
) etc. etc. etc.
When I ask them if a sand bunker in the same location would be acceptable and not too difficult they always say "yeah, but....." A pond? A grass bunker? A OK to all, even the pond with no recovery shot.
So, why is the VofS not an acceptable hazard alternative to most golfers?
BTW, Wiley is now advertising Mark and Forrest's Hazards book on their flyers, so it is out, or very, very close.