Sorry it's taken me so long to get back on this, but I had some family problems which had to take precedence.
Jason, the routing you played in the Dixie Cup is 80% what you see in Travis's plan. When Donald Ross (1939) was retained to renovate the course and grass the greens, he apparently saw no reason to make major changes. Other than some minor relocations of bunkers, tees, and green sites (for example, the green on current #15, #4 on Travis's plan, was about 50 yards short of Ross's site, fairly close to what is now a crossing bunker), the most significant changes were as follow:
1) The opening hole (now #13) was changed from a par 4 to a par 5, moving the greensite approx. 70 yards down the RR tracks.
2) The second hole, with the tee shot crossing the tracks, was eliminated.
3) The twelfth hole (now #5) was changed from a 154 yard par 3 to a 305 yard par 4.
4) The thirteenth hole (now #6) was changed from a 400 yard par 4 to a 235 yard par 3.
5) A new par 3, then #18 and now #12, was added.
Bill:
You're correct, the uphill #12 is now the second hole on the "hotel" side of the RR tracks. As I said above, that is the only hole at Camden that is 100% original Donald Ross. The rest of the routing is primarily Travis's.
The only major changes which have been made since Donald Ross's renovation in 1939 have been to:
-- Change Travis/Ross #14 (now #1) from a par 5 to a par 4, accommodating the clubhouse and swimming pool. Note.... I think this is a damn shame and one the club needs to REALLY try to turn back.... The Travis hole (which Ross left unchanged) was the strongest par 5 on the course at 575 yards with a TINY green, and the resulting par 4 is mediocre at best.
-- Lengthen Travis #3, Ross #2 (now #14) to make a strong par 4 into a short (very mediocre) par 5. Note: It's interesting that Travis had this hole as a par 5 from the back tees (which were slightly forward from the current "mens" teebox but as a par 5 from the forward tees (which were about where our "Senior" tees are now).
Ed sent me the PDF file of this plan, and with the ability to zoom as much as I wanted, I was struck with the number of Travis's "Humps and Hollows with Sand Pockets" that were noted (several of which looked to be very large). Only a few of these survived into the 1960's, when I first played the course, and none survived the latest renovation. It'd be interesting if we could reintroduce some of these features.
Jamey