"The smaller groups weren't as full of self-importance as the crowd that has tried to dominate golfclubatlas.com.
There is a heavy-handed-know-it-all that is pervasive in some here that actually gets a little too predictable."
redanman:
Oh Bullshit!
With the possible exception of Patrick Mucci there's no one on here, not even me, who constantly acts the "know-it-all" like you do and always have done.
As for the architects, those on here and other-wise, no doubt some of them are truly brilliant and talented but even they should never act like as soon as they hang up their shingle and get into the business they're suddenly imbued with some special or secret talent in golf architecture that others who aren't in the business will never know or could never understand.
I've said it before and even though it drives some in the business on here crazy, the one who I think probably has as much or more raw talent than anyone certainly in conceptual architecture is Geoff Shackelford. I don't care what he's done or not done, his ideas that certainly can go on the ground with or without an architect are truly brilliant, in my opinion---and they're quite unique too, not for the least reason being he just may have a better understanding of the true history and evolution of golf course architecture than anyone. It doesn't matter that he's quite young----young or not he's just got that special knack, in my opinion. Have a serious conversation about this stuff sometime, go out on a site with him sometime---you can't help notice it.
But there will be those in the business who say he's never done much so how can that be said. I don't care. I don't even care if what he's done or did do was ever particulaly popular---the stuff that comes out of his head is brilliance---particularly conceptually. I realize he's not really in the business for business, but even if he was I doubt that'd have much influence on what he did or thought.
Let the wailing and gnashing of teeth begin.