I can explain how a newspaper can let its golf writer get his facts consistently wrong. No matter how big the newspaper, there are not enough staffers to have a fact-checker looking over the shoulder of every beat writer. It would be ideal if newspapers
could afford to have that level of fact-checking, but the fact is beat writers are the ultimate -- and usually the only -- authorities in their field of expertise.
Maybe the guys back in the newsroom were watching the coverage and were lucky enough to catch the mistake. With the U.S. Am, that's extremely unlikely.
I was a TV critic for a metro newspaper for seven years, and no one else on the staff knew whether what I was writing in my column was right or wrong. That could be a problem on the (excedingly rare
) occasions when I made a mistake; at times it would have been nice to have someone on the desk catch the mistake, but I was basically on my own when it came to the facts on my beat.
It's the same for any beat writer, including a golf writer. If readers call the editors' attention to enough mistakes, the editors will eventualy find it necessary to make a beat change.