After watching today's US AM tv coverage I was very impressed by the architecture at Merion. The last 3 holes have fantastcally bold greens that really confounded the particpants. The chance to see the first 4 holes in the playoffs was a real treat; I was hoping the Harmon match would continue so we could see the much discussed 5th hole! Everything I saw indicated that the greens control the scores; many players struggled to stay on the green from the ideal position in the center of the ribbons they call fairways.
My question is does Merion need that much rough to challange the participants? Wouldn't players with a less than ideal angle pay a severe penalty for an overly ambicious shot?
I feel they could get into more serious trouble with a bad angle and a good lie than a marginal one.
Greenside rough seems very one dimensional also. If the rough was trimmed back I could imagine players would be confronted with many more greenside shots than the hacks we are witnessing.
Am I nieve to think that scores would be that different if players were given enough rope to hang themselves at Merion East?