I know a course that rounded-up their common bermudagrass, even twice, for a total kill and replaced it with TifSport only to have their common re-emerge prevalently in patches three years hence. Other courses which have implemented TifSport are having similar problems. Some other courses which have implemented 419 don't seem to be as affected.
In your experience, which is more important....the kill or the dominant traits of the turf replacement? In other words, would the results likely have been different, if a time-tested turf, such as 419, was used? Or would the results be different if more emphasis were placed upon the kill -- preparing and purifying the soil?
Thanks for your input!