News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


THuckaby2

Re:Trial run -- Discussion of a golf course
« Reply #25 on: August 08, 2005, 10:48:36 AM »
Scott - well I understood exactly what you said straight from the top.  But perhaps that's because I am curmudgeonly about this whole idea... I really think the more rules you put on discussions, the more difficult they become.  But we shall see.  In any case it's clear under these rules that Chicago GC is out.  SFGC would work, but we have beaten that to death many times already also...


Scott_Burroughs

Re:Trial run -- Discussion of a golf course
« Reply #26 on: August 08, 2005, 11:03:37 AM »
Huck,

Yeah, and I also suggested discussing holes/stuff that Ran didn't cover....and besides, CGC doesn't really get that much talk here regardless of it's previous GCA profile.

This was a previous post of mine that listed a number of prominent courses that don't have course profiles (notice no CGC and the mention of Myopia's status  ;) - I wonder when CGC was de-linked?) :

http://www.golfclubatlas.com/forums2/index.php?board=1;action=display;threadid=18087;start=msg321030#msg321030

Tags: