Lou, I haven't been to Dubsdread in longer than 10 years, so if there's even more tree encroachment, I pity the fool who spends his $$, just to play a Phil Blackmar tour venue.
I don't know how highly rated the course is by the Mags. I place it in contention with proabably 1000 other courses for a bottom 10 slot.
I just know, that when I was a Chicagoan, it was held in very high esteem because of it's accesability (and it's sand)
Since I left Chicago, and been exposed to other great venues I can look back with that 20/20 vision- hindsight- and know that Dubsdread does not stand up to other"great" golf architecture. Really really good comercial golf, I'll agree to.
Specifically, the second hole was always a bother, for me. It seemed so goofy, even before I knew what GCA was. Looking back now, there were many spots on the course that could fairly be described as "uncomfortable".
Generally, the course seemed forced on the land, from the convoluted routing, to the excessive reliance on trees. That's why I think they should bag the whole lot, and start over using design principles that closely respect the craddle.