From the left, the green is very similar conceptually to the 11th except.......it is 10 yards deep rather than 40 yards, and also flatter so not as receptive to the aerial game, and, we all saw how the pros ate up #11--NOT!
I think if anybody tried to make a green complex like 17 for a short hole, they would be laughed off the premises. This is why it is so hard.
All that being said, the hole played a lot easier than I have ever seen it do for an Open. Partly technology (which took the fear away from the tee shot) and partly the emasculation of the RHB. One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet, I think, about the RHB.....
.....when Nakajima had his disaster there in 1978(?) the "lip" of the bunker was longer and better integrated into the green. Nakajima actually hit the green with his 2nd and then putted into the RHB! This is impossible today for an elite player due to the heightened lip. Then, when Nakajima tried to get out, he actually did so on 2-3 of his shots, but because the lip was broader his ball rolled back into the bunker. The flip side of this higher lip is that it now acts as a backstop for shots hit from the road itself. In the old days, the threat of misjudging the chip and going into the bunker was much greater. The bunker and the road were delicately integrated. They are no more. Finally, the depth of the bunker was no more than chest-high. The bunker "evolved" dramatically from 1978 to 2000. Those of you who saw it and loved it in the late 90's were seeing and falling in love with an impostor.....
I, for one, am very much looking forward to McPherson's book on the Evolution of the Old Course. It should help clear up a number of popular misconceptions, the most prevalent of which is that TOC is a purely natural course that has only gently been touched by the hand of man. Men are just not that gentle, in the real world.....