TEPaul,
I'd hazard a guess that Ross's alleged comment may have been directed toward Gulfstream or Boca Raton, but certainly not Seminole.
Ray Charles could tell that Seminole wasn't FLAT.
And, I would bet that Tom MacWood researched and viewed the Terra Server topos I referenced, so he knows the property isn't flat, but can't admit it and he can't admit that he, the self proclaimed historical researcher made a colossal blunder.
Hence, if he's disengenuous in his failure to acknowledge that Seminole ISN"T FLAT, is he disengenuous in discussing other issues ? Intellectual dishonesty doesn't confine itself to a sole issue. False in one, false in many.
Brad Klein had this to say in "Remembering Donald Ross"
It would be interesting to learn the name of this architect who proposed leveling the MASSIVE 40-foot sand ridge that would ultimately give Seminole its distinctive character.
In an area known for lack of elevation, such a landform was to be treasured rather than destroyed.
Ross did n not share the idea of taking down the ridge and using the soil to fill the low areas of this site; this would have made the tract no different than 100 other Florida layouts. His instincts for using the native lay of the land would not allow him to entertain so grandiose an earthmoving project as moving 100,000 or so cubic yards of dirt. Nor would his sense of modest budgets indulge in such a project.
Quite to the contrary, he used the ridge to BOLD effect, making it a central point of the routing. Indeed, the genius of the two returning nines is that each one twice visits the highest point of the ridge..... The result is that fully four greens and four tees are situated atop it, without in any way creating a sense of undue crowding.
On the contrary, visitors to this day REVEL in the long views of both the ocean and the entire golf course afforded them from this unique vantage point.
Anyone who visits the site is impressed with the elevation changes afforded by the two dunes that run through the property in a north-south direction, and Ross's use of them.
When Tom MacWood emphatically declares that Seminole is FLAT it's indicative of his blind acceptance and allegiance to questionable if not totally inaccurate information that he's come into possesion of, failure to verify the facts and a failure to personally visit and investigate any site before drawing conclusions, especially emphatic ones.
He claims that he's a historical researcher, but, how can anyone who claims Seminole is FLAT be taken seriously ?
How can anybody who accepts ANY quote he's read as the gospel, without investigating it to verify if the facts or the quote are accurate ?
That's not being a historical researcher, that's being intellectually dishonest... a fraud.