I played in the 2003 Met Open at Metedeconk and found the course to be overly penal. I'll give three point I enjoyed and three points I disliked...
Enjoyed...
1. Setting. It is on a beautiful piece of property. Deer roaming everywhere and you feel like you are in the middle of nowhere.
2. Practice facility. Unbelievable driving range, putting greens and short game greens. You can work on any part of your game in complete privacy.
3. Clubhouse. A fine example of a clubhouse that is fantastic without being 100,000 square feet.
Disliked...
1. Excluding the par 3's there wasn't one hole under 400 yards from the back tees. There wasn't one great short par 4.
2. Playable width of holes were extremely tight for the length. 450+ yard holes shouldn't be 40-50 yards wide from tree line to tree line on every hole. I never felt comfortable on any tee shot. There was no let up, anywhere. Fairways were 30 yards wide, maximum.
3. The trees. The trees were not the kind you can play out of. There was no room to stand in them, let alone swing. Effectively, if you hit the ball in the trees you were screwed, totally. It was like playing with OB left and right on every hole. It was that penal.
In total, I ended up hitting more irons and 3-woods off the tee thatn drivers. On a course measuring 7,300- 7,400 yards that becomes pretty boring and aggravating after a while.
In summary, I'd play there again for the country club experience but I would never play there for the enjoyment of examining my game or for a fun round of golf.
Jeff F.