Forrest,
Hectic in thought? Perhaps. I guess my feelings are in part due to situations where a lack of continuation between nines exist. Be they built by different architects, or in different eras. I would like to correct your interpretation of my statement, I do not think that 27-hole layouts should not be defined as a true course, I simply feel that they, in the example stated above, lack an tangible identity that an 18-hole course has. Because of the 3-loops of 9, a nice variety can be achieved, namely 6 different courses (NS-NW-SN-SW-WS-WN), but each course has a different feel, albeit shades of the same colour. Maybe it's simply an idiosyncratic preference to define & categorize courses, an easier task at an 18-hole track? I can really define my sentiments appropriately, it's just a preference (I've never dreamt up my ideal dream course as a 27-hole layout).
As stated in my earlier post, I feel that a 27-hole layout has many functional benefits to the smooth operation of a golf course.
Tyler Kearns