Scary, I have 70-80% agreement with Jeff Fortson, but only 50% with Hendren.
Only those who putt on pure bent can attibute anything positive to the weed called bermuda.
I enjoy many modern golf courses.
Fazio knows what he is doing, does it well, and will go down in history as one of the Top 10 architects ever.
Not all Classic courses are classic.
If MacKenzie was alive today, he would be teaming up with Fazio and maybe Doak to better cover the world. He would also visit his courses more than once or twice.
If Colonial CC is in the Top 50 Classic, Ohio State-Scarlet is in the Top 25.
Firm fairways but receptive, mid-speed greens are more friendly to and enjoyable for the average player.
There are some fundamentals or formulas to good design. Variety of holes is near the top of the list, as is balance.
I would rather have an interesting, strong, but otherwise manufactured hole than one that's bland and just used as a connector in a more quaint routing.
The maintenance meld is secondary to great architecture, but a course that is not maintained in accordance with its design will seldom be considered great.
No matter what is written and opined here, someone will surely recast it, misrepresent it, then argue passionately against it.
We tend to think we are part of a select group that "gets it". For a variety of reasons, mostly insidious and dark, those who disagree with us obviously don't.