Sean,
My comments should be understood in the context of a single round there. I like the 11th, but the incline is tough, particularly following 450 yards of incline from the 10th tee to the 11th tee. At 280 lbs I could be biased.
The existing depression short-right of the 12th begs for a water hazard, but I think it would be redundant given the orientation of the green. Anyone whose second leaks to the right (not the low-handicapper) is already penalized by the orientation of the green, which makes a pitch from that depression dicey at best, particularly to a back pin. IMHO, the pond would dictate a long approach coming in from the left side. This is already the line of charm provided by the cant of the fairway there. The hole is thereby changed from strategic to penal, I'm guessing for the sake of toughening it up.
Neither hole is pedestrian. I just question whether the routing should be interupted unless the resulting holes are outstanding in some manner.
I thought the 17th green was over the top and its pot bunkers out of place. Also, the short holes, with the exception of ninth, required the same club +/-.
These are just picked nits - but support my opinion that it's not "definitely" a top 100 golf course.
That said, it doesn't miss by much. I think it is an outstanding golf course with the best set of greens (internal contours and surrounds) I've seen from the architect - really good stuff with variety and attention to detail. Also, a very fun place to drive the golf ball, including the blind shots from the 3rd and 17th tees. I liked the scale of the bunkering as well, but thought the fairway bunkering through the doglegs was slightly overused. The 8th was one of my favorite golf holes played this year, as I've noted before.
I would be thrilled to be a member there.
Mike