News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Tom Doak

Road crossings
« on: January 16, 2003, 03:20:25 PM »
I was trying to find ammunition AGAINST laying out a new golf course so that it straddles a major development road.  However, when I started going through my top 100 list, I got quite a surprise:  23 of the top 100 courses in the world feature a road crossing.  (Not one of them, however, involves a tunnel.)

Even more amazing:  four of the top six require you to hit across a road!  (That's Pebble Beach, Cypress Point, the Old Course at St. Andrews, and Shinnecock Hills; National Golf Links is shamefully not among the top ten.)

My conclusion:  road crossings are OK, as long as they don't involve a long walk.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Jeff_McDowell

Re: Road crossings
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2003, 03:28:00 PM »
I like your conclusion, but avoiding the long walk is not always easy, and sometimes impossible. I'm curious to see how you minimize the walk.

I avoided a long walk in a residential development by having the holes routed almost perpendicular to the road. One hole played up to the hole, and the next hole played away from the hole. The developer lost a couple lots, but for some reason he was o.k. with this. This shortened the walk from 600 feet to 300 feet. Not great but better.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

TEPaul

Re: Road crossings
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2003, 03:45:05 PM »
Tom, my God man, you forgot Pine Valley (at least three paved road crossings and some other very cool ones like Philly Cricket, Pittsburgh Field Club, Piping Rock and a number of others, I believe.

Even little old Gulph Mills has a road crossing and this year they were threatening to remove the road because it chops up the look of our 3rd hole.

Over my dead body! If they try it I'm gluing myself to that road in front of the road wrecking machinery.

You know what I just found out? That road crossing our 3rd hole is a Colonial road and I just found out that George Washington himself traveled it and actually stayed in the house that was just to the right of our 3rd hole for six days in 1777 as he was moving his troops from Whitemarsh to Valley Forge. I'm not kidding about that--I'm completely serious--it's documented.

Not quite as completely documented is the fact George Washington knocked up the lady who lived in the nearby building (just to the left of our 3rd fairway) that is now one of our maintenance buildings. With my research ability I think I'm close to documenting that too particularly since I've been noticing some queer people with wooden choppers in the vicinity of our 3rd hole lately.

Anyway, cross the development road. I might even recommend you put a post and rail fence on either side of the road for golfers to hit over and cross through a gate on. A nice old fashioned touch sort of thing! Maybe they can have relief from the road and the fence but personally I wouldn't recommend it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Tom Doak

Re: Road crossings
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2003, 03:50:51 PM »
TE:  I didn't count Pine Valley because those aren't public roads.  If you want to count driveways into the clubhouse, you could add about ten more courses to my count.  (Brookline, for starters.)

In the routing I'm doing, I can't hit across the road.  I'm trying to make the case that the entire golf course should be on one side of the main development artery, instead of split to both sides of it.  They have enough ground to do it either way, but with the topography factored in, I can't see a solution which doesn't involve a fairly long hike.  I know my clients don't really care -- they're developers -- but I'm trying my best.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Road crossings
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2003, 04:17:05 PM »
Is there a real upside to straddling the road? Better land so better holes? If they have the land, why not keep it all on one side?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Mike Benham

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Road crossings
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2003, 05:09:22 PM »
Tom -

At Pebble, are you counting #16 as crossing the road or the back-back tee on #17?

The 1st hole at Stanford, up on a bluff, goes over Junipero Serra Blvd, a heavily travelled road.  If you top your tee shot, you could plunk a car ...

Mike
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »
"... and I liked the guy ..."

ian

Re: Road crossings
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2003, 05:26:31 PM »
Tom,

St. Georges, in Toronto, has a tunnel from the clubhouse to the first tee (on the other side of Islington). Does that count?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Eric Pevoto

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Road crossings
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2003, 08:16:12 PM »
How much is the road travelled?  I think you forgot this one:

Road crossings are OK if there is minimal risk of auto/pedestrian accident.  If not, tunnels might be a good option.  ;)

How do you think a tunnel effects the routing?  If it detracts, exactly how so?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:01 PM by -1 »
There's no home cooking these days.  It's all microwave.Bill Kittleman

Golf doesn't work for those that don't know what golf can be...Mike Nuzzo

Phil_the_Author

Re: Road crossings
« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2003, 08:20:12 PM »
Tom,

At Bethpage Black, in order to get from the first green to the second tee, there is a small tunnel for use of the players that runs under Round Swamp Road. This is also used for those playing the green course as well.

Coming off the 14th green, one has to cross Round Swamp Road, with clubs in hand or on pull cart, while avoiding active traffic!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Pete_Pittock

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Road crossings
« Reply #9 on: January 16, 2003, 08:21:29 PM »
TD,
 What about Lost Dunes? I hear that worked out pretty well crossing under the interstate. Just keep doing what is best on the site.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

John Lyon

Re: Road crossings
« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2003, 08:37:32 PM »
Played Lost Dunes in October.  Lots of fun.  Second and fourth holes were great.  Only putted off two greens.  The first hole plays across the access road..it worked fine and yes there is a long distance between 7 and 8 that goes under the interstate.   Our group walked and the staff did a great job picking us up in a cart and riding the 1/4 mile to the 8th tee.  What did not work for me was the interstate road noise. It was constant and loud (probably worse than usual without leaves on the trees).  I guess I'm spoiled, at my home club I only hear birds and crickets.  It is a significant blemish in and otherwise fine course.  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Jim Sweeney

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Road crossings
« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2003, 09:36:46 PM »
TEPaul-

The house right of your third hole was there for six days in 1777? We may have to re-write the history of golf in the U.S.!

Seriously, I've played lots of courses with road crossings. Often going from one side to the other signals a transition from one environment to another- hilly to flat (Farmington CC in CT., for example), or landscaped resort/development to desert (several courses in AZ and Palm Springs that I've played. If crossing a road helps such a transition, go for it! Sound's like that's not Mr. Doak's situation, though.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »
"Hope and fear, hope and Fear, that's what people see when they play golf. Not me. I only see happiness."

" Two things I beleive in: good shoes and a good car. Alligator shoes and a Cadillac."

Moe Norman

Michael Dugger

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Road crossings
« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2003, 09:41:09 PM »
Master P.....are you really the rapper?  I asked this a while ago and never got a response.  Yous wills always remines me of who guy who brought eubonics to the GCA discussion forum.  

Why all the attitude brah???  We's cool
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »
What does it matter if the poor player can putt all the way from tee to green, provided that he has to zigzag so frequently that he takes six or seven putts to reach it?     --Alistair Mackenzie--

Matthew Mollica

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Road crossings
« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2003, 01:18:22 AM »
There seems to be lots of guys here posting courses that have road crossings, and the final count would probably be more than 25 of the top 100 courses, that have some sort of private or public carriageway in the midst of the routing, by the time it's all done.

Simply because some courses do have road crossings, isn't a compelling case to say that a course should cross a road(s). Imagine how good the courses and experiences upon those courses would be if they didn't have to have the crossing interfere...

In TD's example, he's not talking about the small road in and out of a course, like we see at Pebble, where one simply traverses a paved segment, to get from #15 tee box to landing area. He's talking a big, noisy, wide, high volume road, which seperates one green, and the next tee, by a reasonable way.

My experience has been that the roads significantly detract from the total experience, and enough such that they should be avoided wherever possible. The down-grading of Royal Melbourne East, by a large number of experts, is due to the road crossings, and it occurs despite the contribution of 6 high quality holes to the Royal Melb Composite layout, and many other quality holes on the other sides of the crossings.

Tom - I'd avoid it if I could, unless there's a very large problem arising in being contained on one side of the road, or if there is some sort of nirvana on the other side.

I know some will think - "the client is a land developer, so what does he care? I'll cross the road". I know others here will also think "this course bears my name and it will be the best it can be". I'm tipping you're the latter Tom....

MM
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:01 PM by -1 »
"The truth about golf courses has a slightly different expression for every golfer. Which of them, one might ask, is without the most definitive convictions concerning the merits or deficiencies of the links he plays over? Freedom of criticism is one of the last privileges he is likely to forgo."

Mike Hendren

Re: Road crossings
« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2003, 07:41:55 AM »
As indicated, road crossings are far more common than one would think.  I'll add Ross' Belle Meade CC and Beverly CC, as well as Cascades and little Ansley in Atlanta.  At my home course, we have an at-grade rail crossing.  

Regards,

Mike
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Tom Doak

Re: Road crossings
« Reply #15 on: January 17, 2003, 07:50:48 AM »
Matthew M:  Contrary to your last paragraph, I think most golf architects would tend to say, "the client is a land developer, they don't know the difference, so I'll avoid crossing the road."  I don't know an architect who would cross the road if he didn't have to.

However, the land developer client may see a benefit in having golf course frontage on both sides of the road.  If so, I have to make the case that the road crossing will detract from the golf experience and their chances of having the course received as the best in the area.  I was just surprised to sort through the top 100 list and see how many courses had road crossings ... most of them far more dangerous than what I would have to do, but not as disruptive to the round of golf because they don't involve a long cart ride or an even longer walk.

This developer COULD have opted for an 18-hole contiguous course with practically no housing intrusion ... they have about 500 acres at the front of their property which they're not allowed to put houses on.  Now, they're trying to choose between nine holes on that side and nine holes among the houses, or 18 among the houses.  I'm thinking of steering them toward the 18 with houses, to avoid the long gap between sides and to preserve the possibility of doing the course I wanted to do later on.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

john stiles

Re: Road crossings
« Reply #16 on: January 17, 2003, 12:02:15 PM »
Adding to the above posts...........

I can think of one course where a public road crossing was probably okay until the public road was widened.    The resulting road work took some land from the course and affected the GCA.

I guess a public road crossing might not be bad if you have some land to buffer the road anticipating future road work. Potential road work must be hard to gauge in many cases.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Bob_Huntley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Road crossings
« Reply #17 on: January 17, 2003, 12:20:15 PM »
Tom:

You have made me realize just how many roads we have to cross at MPCC. Admittedly they are itsy-bitsy  things and could be considered private, but not many clubs have as many.

Dunes.   Between Nos. 1 and 2
                  "         "    2 and 3
                           No   6   off the tee        
                  "        Nos 8 and 9 (Tunnel)
                  "          "   12 and 13
                  "          "   13 and 14
                  "          "   17 and 18  


On the now defunct Shore there were four roads to cross.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

John Bernhardt

Re: Road crossings
« Reply #18 on: January 17, 2003, 01:02:02 PM »
Tom I think there is a huge difference between a road crossing and a road crossing lol. The traffic count may not only impact the crossing but a few hundred yards in each direction.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Forrest Richardson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Road crossings
« Reply #19 on: January 17, 2003, 07:12:38 PM »
If enough attention is paid to the crossing it can be quite OK, even acceptable. At oakmont, for example, the golfer is able to look down and say to himself, "Poor bast*#ds...all having to go to work or wherever..." In the best theatrical experiences we take an intermission. This brings us out of the theater and gives a moment to reflect on how lost we may have become in the performance itself. My advice: keep it away from the finishing holes and try to have it over and done with no later than 13 or 14. Of course I am assuming 18-holes. Tunnels can be really neat experiences. Again, they are thresholds of sorts.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »
— Forrest Richardson, Golf Course Architect/ASGCA
    www.golfgroupltd.com
    www.golframes.com

Paul_Turner

Re: Road crossings
« Reply #20 on: January 17, 2003, 10:23:50 PM »
Royal Worlington and Newmarket is another famous one.  Not a busy road, more of a lane really, but still a public road.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Forrest Richardson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Road crossings
« Reply #21 on: January 18, 2003, 06:59:50 AM »
Paul -- Worlington has recently been pressured by the village to do "something" about the road crossing No. 9 prior to green -- but it was laughed off by all the powers that be. I believe there is a new sign, however, which cautions vehicles. Of course, if you've had plenty of the Pink Jug and go to leave you may wind up driving down No. 9 instead of crossing it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »
— Forrest Richardson, Golf Course Architect/ASGCA
    www.golfgroupltd.com
    www.golframes.com

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back