"Don't waste your time...Crump died in Merchantville."
You waste our time if you have proof and don't demonstrate it. The truth is all that matters, there is no agenda fwith any of us that question you. If you can substantiate it with archival records, do so. If not, please stop making these definitive statements.
By the way, Crump's death is significant--to his family and friends. It is a personal matter that you choose to bring up trying to defend the non-connected idea that the circumstance of his death has something to do with a distortion of the architectural record and the perceived slight to Colt. This despite the overwhelming evidence that points to the club mistakenly given too much credit to Colt. I do not believe that the manner of Crump's death is significant to the understanding of architectural history and attribution. You evidently do.
However he died, and it was tragically young--not unlike others in the district such as Hugh Wilson, Frederick Taylor, William Flynn, Howard Toomey and others. The story that fascinates me most is not the death itself, but how the club continued on and the manner in which the course was completed. Crump was beloved and his friends banded together to see the dream completed in a spirit of collaboration that honored the founder and his friendships.
I think Crump is easily one of the most fascinating gentlemen in Philadelphia golf. Certainly stories of his death have been circulating for many years. If the truth is knowable, then it should be known. Whether you are right or wrong, it should not be disseminated in the manner you have chosen. I find it difficult to believe these men cared about attribution and the historical record. Yet you would believe they conspired to glorify him beyond reality. They were gentlemen golfers and shared a love for the sport and for their companions. Leave it at that while you tilt at your windmills.