Jim Lewis,
Originally,# 12 was a par 5 from further back, but it was discovered that the back of the tee was not on Pine Tree property and the hole was shortened and a huge fica/banyan planted on the back of the current 12th.
I believe that the 10th was a par 4 and was converted to a par 5 to offset the loss of par at # 12.
Today, # 10 plays as a par 4 and a par 5 depending on the tee location.
JMKirk,
Pine Tree gets great variety in the winds as do most Florida golf courses, and, they tend to be pretty strong, making them a major factor at Pine Tree and other near coastal golf courses.
You're not going to get much in the way of elevation changes in South Florida, and quite frankly, I don't see elevation changes as the sole or primary determinate for superior architecture.
Would you relate to me your concept of lack of elevation changes equalling inferiority in the context of St Andrews, TOC. Would you classify this course as being unable to present a complete test due to its lack of elevation changes ?
It lacks uphill and downhill shots that force the golfer to gauge elevation changes, which you feel is an important factor.
Under that criterion, I don't think you'd like many of the great links courses of the UK
Since 1996 Pine Tree has been screening the golf course from the nearby homes. In many cases, they are no longer visible.
When you play the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 12th, 13th 16th, 17th and 18th holes at GCGC the homes are clearly visible, some far more then others, yet GCGC remains a great golf course. Winged Foot, Westhampton and others are likewise crowded by adjacent homes. Your criteria should be consistent, to be objective.
Rob Waldron,
Charlie is great, and you've provided excellent advice.
An additional 1/2 to full club will greatly reward most golfers.
Getting past the mid-point of most greens eliminates many bunkers, although, holes like # 2, 8, 12, 13, and 15 are the exceptions.
It's clearly an aerial golf course.
There are holes that accomodate run-ups, but they're the exception, not the rule, and most of the run-up areas are to a corner of the green, like # 4, 7, 11, 12, 16 and 18.
Ed Baker,
# 5 is about 610 or so from the back, while # 16 is 670 from the back, but I find # 5 much harder due to the prevailing wind, much smaller green, and tighter second shot LZ.
# 1 and # 2 are spectacular starting holes, especially into the prevailing wind.
If it doesn't rain, I think I'll visit Charlie tomorrow.