Matt:
To each his own. I could play each of these golf holes 1000 times and I'm never going to prefer the one in NY. Yes, it has a wonderful green, far superior to that at 16CPC. I've said that already. But is a par three to be assessed simply based on its green? Not in my book, not even close. It's the sum total of shot requirements, green and yes SETTING that make up the equation. WF#10 wins on one, but loses on the other two by such a large margin that to me this comparison is really quite laughable. And all three do matter.
Here's the thing also, Matt: you keep going on about how tough the recovery requirements are on WF10, and tough they are, yes. But unless you are Christ himself, they're always gonna be a hell of a lot easier than those at CP16, where walking on H2O would be the requirement to play the shot.
redanman:
Who said anything about ARCHITECTURE? I could give a rats ass about the subject. I'm talking about playing the golf holes. It was, is, always shall be, far more inspiring and fun to play CP16 than WF10. Architecture? Hell, what do any of us know? Leave that to those in the business.