I too played Bethpage Black this year for the first time. My impression going in was that there were a number of other courses at this public facility but the Black was meant to be what it is marketed as, a golf course that is not for everybody based upon its difficulty.
Mike Malone did not play the course under tournament conditions. The greens are being mowed at .125" and all the nuances and comlpexities are not evident at these green speeds. So he should take into account that the course is being set up for off-season play and that it is a different test with green heights around .1" and less; around 12-13 on the stimp. He also played the course at its US Open narrowness and that to me is a shame. Yeah, people want the open experience, but the course suffers for us mortals with these widths. Yet, with greater fairway width should be more interesting green sites to initiate strategy off the tee shot. I think this is one area that the course falls a bit short. With classic course width, the greens are not that demanding and the greenside bunkers are pretty removed from the green margins.
No doubt about it, the greens are not the course's strongpoint. They are rather flat in general and some are downright boring. Tee to green, this is an excellent golf course. It is long and hard, much more interesting in my mind than Aronimink even though Aronimink has far more complex greens. I think that, given the other courses in the complex, that the Black could have more interesting green complexes. Granted, Winged Foot West complexes on this course would make it one of the most difficult, if not the most difficult, courses in the world. Still, the greens could've been further along the interest scale than currently found there. Fenway like greens would've worked very well in my opinion.
The routing is quite good and indeed expansive. I think the collection of par 3s are very good, particularly 17. It is such a good front 9 tee to green (especially 4-9) but the greens on some of the best hole designs are some of the weakest. I concur with Geoff that these include 3,5,6,7,9. I also think that 7 should be a par 4 with the back tee from the Open tee (maybe because I reached the green in 2 from there!) and the course would thus play as par 70.
As for the back 9, it doesn't suit my eye so well. The long stretches of bunkering on both sides of the fairway on 10, 11, and 18 is too much. The shapes are a bit overdone as are the number of bunkers. This is my personal feeling, I freely admit others are justified in liking the look. It is a big world. I also felt that 18 was a rather mundane finish after 15, 16, and 17 although I played from the 380 tee. The back tee would be admittedly more interesting.
Bethpage Black, to me, is far superior to Philadelphia Cricket Club. I liked Fenway better than the Black--it had interesting ground and superior greens. As for Winged Foot West, I thought the green sites are as good as it gets. The fairways are a bit tame--flat for the most part. I like uneven stances and natural rolls in fairways. However, I clearly liked WFW better than Bethpage Black....maybe I give a lot of weight to green sites. I also play hilly courses quite a bit so the elevated approaches at Bethpage weren't unnerving. My game was off but not because of the elevation changes.